A Bold Editorial Move—Then a Sudden Halt
Initially, the editorial board of the LA Times was gearing up to publish a multi-part series titled "The Case Against Trump." This series was set to run throughout the week, with an endorsement of Kamala Harris scheduled for publication on Sunday. It was a bold editorial strategy that promised to engage readers on two pressing political fronts. However, this ambitious plan was abruptly halted by Soon-Shiong, a billionaire with roots in South Africa, who ordered the cancellation of both the series and Harris’s endorsement without offering any clear explanation.
The internal memos obtained by TheWrap reveal a chaotic situation within the paper. Staffers, both current and former, confirmed that Soon-Shiong’s decision sparked a significant crisis for the 142-year-old institution. This abrupt intervention not only silenced an important editorial voice but also undermined the integrity of the newspaper’s editorial independence.
The Fallout: Resignations and Unrest
In the wake of this controversy, the Los Angeles Times has seen a wave of resignations. Editorial writer Karin Klein and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Robert Greene both announced their departures on Thursday, following the resignation of Editorial Editor Mariel Garza, who left in protest just a day prior. The reasons for their exits were clear: they were disillusioned by Soon-Shiong's actions, which they saw as an attack on the paper’s editorial integrity.
Garza’s resignation letter was particularly poignant. She articulated her frustration by stating, “The owner vetoed the editorial board's plan to endorse Kamala Harris for president.” She further emphasized that canceling Harris’s endorsement undermines the credibility of the editorial board’s entire process. "People will justifiably wonder if each endorsement was a decision made by a group of journalists after extensive research and discussion, or through decree by the owner," she added, capturing the sentiment of many in the newsroom.
Blame Games and Miscommunication
Soon-Shiong has responded to the fallout with a statement that seemed to shift blame onto the editorial team for the lack of an endorsement. He claimed the board had the opportunity to craft a balanced argument comparing Trump and Harris but chose to remain silent. “Instead of adopting this path as suggested, the editorial board chose to remain silent, and I accepted their decision,” he stated. This response raised eyebrows and drew further ire from the editorial staff, who felt it misrepresented the reality of the situation.
Garza countered Soon-Shiong’s claims, stating in a follow-up statement that the editorial board had pitched an endorsement and was not allowed to write one. Klein, adding her voice to the dissent, described Soon-Shiong's actions as cowardly, calling him a "chickens—" and made it clear in her resignation that the board was not the one choosing silence—he had blocked their voice.
Family Comments and Additional Complications
To complicate matters further, Soon-Shiong’s daughter weighed in with comments suggesting that the decision to quash the endorsement, which included articles that critically examined Trump, was somehow related to the ongoing conflict in Gaza. This added an additional layer of complexity and confusion to an already tumultuous situation, prompting further criticism from both staff and readers alike.
Despite the mounting turmoil, the Los Angeles Times has not made a public statement addressing the crisis directly to its readers. As of now, leading editors Terry Tang and Hector Becerra have yet to engage with the concerns raised by their staff, further fueling frustrations within the newsroom.
Union Response and the Bigger Picture
The Los Angeles Times Guild, representing the paper’s staff, has been vocal about the situation, expressing deep concern over Soon-Shiong’s decision to block the planned presidential endorsement. In a statement, they criticized him for unfairly blaming the editorial board members for the lack of an endorsement, emphasizing the importance of editorial independence in a democratic society.
On Thursday, the Guild reiterated its concerns, stressing the need for answers from ownership. They also urged readers to maintain their subscriptions, highlighting that these subscriptions help fund the salaries of hundreds of journalists working hard to keep the public informed during these critical times. “A healthy democracy is an informed democracy,” they concluded, reinforcing the essential role of journalism in society.
The Broader Implications for Journalism
This crisis raises significant questions about editorial independence in journalism, especially in an era where ownership can heavily influence the direction and tone of a publication. As the LA Times navigates this turmoil, it serves as a case study in the importance of maintaining a free press that operates without undue influence from its owners.
In a landscape increasingly dominated by corporate interests and partisan divides, the LA Times saga underscores the delicate balance between editorial freedom and ownership control. It highlights the necessity for media outlets to uphold their editorial integrity, ensuring that the voices of journalists are not stifled by external pressures.
Looking Ahead
As this situation unfolds, many in the journalism world will be watching closely. The Los Angeles Times has long been a beacon of journalistic integrity, and how it handles this crisis will likely set a precedent for other media organizations facing similar challenges. Will Soon-Shiong allow the editorial board the freedom to operate as they see fit, or will this incident mark a turning point in the relationship between ownership and editorial independence at the LA Times?
In a time when the role of the press is more crucial than ever, the events at the LA Times remind us that the fight for a free and fair press is ongoing. As readers and supporters of journalism, we must advocate for the integrity of our news sources, ensuring that they can provide the honest and comprehensive coverage that a healthy democracy demands. The unfolding drama at the LA Times serves as a crucial reminder of the stakes involved, not just for the paper but for the future of journalism itself.
Login