2024 Pennsylvania Senate Recount: McCormick Leads Casey in Tight Race

Written by Published

The 2024 Pennsylvania Senate race is currently in the midst of a dramatic recount, sparking significant political tension and intense public interest. The initial results saw incumbent Democratic Senator Bob Casey face a tough challenge from Republican candidate Dave McCormick. The race was so close that it has triggered a mandatory recount, as the margin between the two candidates was less than half a percent—just 0.2%. McCormick initially led by a narrow 48.8% to Casey’s 48.6%, translating to a difference of just over 16,000 votes.

The Associated Press (AP) swiftly called the race in McCormick’s favor based on the first count, reporting that he had received 3,398,627 votes to Casey’s 3,382,260. McCormick declared victory in the immediate aftermath, but Casey refused to concede, citing the slim margin and triggering a state-mandated recount for races within a 0.5% margin. This recount began promptly on Wednesday, and it has since become the focal point of national attention, as the stakes for both parties are high.

For context, the November 5 elections saw the Republican Party take control of the Senate, with McCormick's potential win in Pennsylvania contributing to their victory. The GOP secured 53 seats, while Democrats and their affiliates claimed only 47, according to AP’s reporting. This shift in power is significant, especially with the House of Representatives remaining under Republican control, which sets the stage for a much more manageable path for incoming President Donald Trump to push through legislation once he takes office.

As of 4 p.m. ET on Wednesday, the recount showed McCormick holding on to his slim lead over Casey. According to CBS News, McCormick had extended his margin by a few hundred votes after a recount of 29,000 ballots across all 67 counties in Pennsylvania. The state has set a deadline of noon on November 27 for all counties to complete their recounts, with final results expected to be announced the next day.

Despite McCormick’s claim of victory, both his and Casey’s teams are under scrutiny. WJET-TV reported that McCormick's camp claimed that the recount has been relatively uneventful, with only a few hundred votes changing after several counties completed their tallying. While McCormick’s team asserts that the outcome is essentially locked in, Casey’s campaign has refrained from conceding, citing the fact that many votes could still shift as the recount continues. Newsweek was unable to independently confirm the claims made by McCormick's team, so the final results remain uncertain.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) earlier this week, McCormick’s spokesperson Elizabeth Gregory made a statement addressing the recount, saying, "Senator-elect McCormick's lead is too big for this charade to make any difference, but Senator Casey is forcing Pennsylvanians to spend more taxpayer money on a recount anyway." This remark has sparked a great deal of debate, with many questioning whether the costs associated with a recount are justified, especially given McCormick’s apparent lead. The decision to continue with the recount has fueled partisan tensions, with Republicans accusing Casey of dragging out the process unnecessarily.

The recount process itself has not been without its challenges. Dauphin County Commissioner George Hartwick spoke to WJET-TV about the legal requirements for recounting the votes. He explained that all ballots must be run through high-speed scanners, different from those used on election night, to ensure accuracy. Hartwick acknowledged that election workers did not anticipate having to revisit the process so soon, and despite the criticisms they often face, he praised their dedication. “The dedicated public servants are oftentimes the ones who are most criticized,” Hartwick said, underscoring the pressure election officials are under during such an intense and closely watched process.

Beyond the Pennsylvania race, the political landscape is shifting dramatically with the approach of President Trump’s administration. Over the past few weeks, Trump has begun to announce his cabinet picks, fueling speculation and debate about the direction of his presidency. Notable nominees include former Representative Matt Gaetz as attorney general, Fox News host Pete Hegseth for defense secretary, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the nominee for health and human services secretary. Each of these picks will face Senate confirmation hearings, with all requiring a simple majority for approval.

However, the selection of Gaetz, in particular, has sparked skepticism among some Republican leaders. Alaska GOP Senator Lisa Murkowski publicly questioned Gaetz’s suitability for the position of attorney general, stating, “I don’t think it’s a serious nomination for the attorney general. We need to have a serious attorney general. And I’m looking forward to the opportunity to consider somebody that is serious.” Murkowski’s comments reflect a growing divide within the Republican Party, where some are openly questioning Trump’s cabinet choices and whether they are truly the best fit for leading the country.

The ongoing recount in Pennsylvania is more than just a matter of numbers—it’s a critical piece in the larger political puzzle that will shape the next few years of governance in the United States. With the Senate now in Republican hands and Trump’s cabinet picks under scrutiny, every vote counts, and every legal process is being closely watched. For Senator Bob Casey, the recount represents a final attempt to close the gap and ensure his re-election, while Dave McCormick stands poised to officially take control of the Senate seat. The results of this recount could have far-reaching implications, not just for Pennsylvania, but for the political balance of power in Washington, D.C.

As we await the final outcome of the Pennsylvania Senate race, all eyes are on the state’s election officials and the integrity of the recount process. Will McCormick’s lead hold? Will Casey’s refusal to concede lead to a surprising turnaround? And what impact will these developments have on the larger national political scene? Only time will tell, but one thing is clear: Pennsylvania is at the center of a political storm that could shape the course of American history.