In a dramatic turn of events on Tuesday, Rep. Dustin Burrows, a Republican from Lubbock, was elected as the new speaker of the Texas House. This outcome ended an intense and bitter battle for power within the state’s Republican party, culminating in a floor vote that decided the fate of one of the most powerful positions in Texas government. Burrows’ victory not only marked the conclusion of a lengthy struggle but also sent a clear message about the direction the state’s leadership might take in the upcoming legislative session.
When Burrows addressed the House after securing the position, his tone was one of inclusivity and collaboration. He pledged to work with every member of the House, regardless of their vote during the election. "Whether you voted for me or not, my office door will be open to you," Burrows assured his colleagues, signaling his intent to foster a cooperative environment as he navigates the challenges ahead.
This victory was a major blow to the more insurgent wing of the Republican Party, which has been pushing for a more hardline conservative approach in the legislature. For years, this faction has sought to wrest control of the Texas House away from the establishment Republicans, including Burrows and his predecessor, Rep. Dade Phelan of Beaumont. The insurgents, emboldened by a wave of conservative activism, had managed to oust more than a dozen GOP members in the previous year's primaries. These candidates, aligned with Burrows and Phelan, were targeted by the right-wing for their roles in the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton and the failure to pass a controversial private school voucher bill.
After the upheaval in the primaries, the hardline conservatives saw this speaker’s race as their golden opportunity to replace the current leadership. They rallied behind Rep. David Cook of Mansfield, a staunch advocate for their agenda. Cook promised to dismantle the power structures that have traditionally supported Democrats in the House, including efforts to prevent them from chairing committees. He also sought to limit the speaker's authority, aiming to decentralize power within the chamber.
Despite the insurgents’ best efforts, Burrows emerged victorious in the speaker’s race, albeit after a tense two rounds of voting. He won by a significant margin, 85-55, securing support from a diverse coalition of 49 Democrats and 36 Republicans. This victory, however, did not come without controversy. Burrows’ alliance with the Democrats immediately sparked backlash from conservative Republicans and activists, many of whom had hoped for a more right-wing speaker. Some of these critics were vocal on social media, accusing Burrows of betraying the conservative base and embracing "RINO" (Republican In Name Only) tactics.
Rep. Shelley Luther, a freshman Republican who had campaigned against Burrows' leadership, wasted no time in voicing her frustration. "Today, the RINO (anti-MAGA) Establishment laughed in the faces of our Republican grassroots," Luther wrote on social media. "They chose Democrat chairs and lobbyist buddies over their voters." She made it clear that the battle was far from over and vowed to seek retribution in the next primary elections, adding that the fight had only just begun.
The vote itself was a spectacle. In the first round, Rep. Ana-Maria Rodriguez-Ramos, a Democrat from Richardson, managed to garner 23 votes, enough to prevent either Burrows or Cook from reaching the majority threshold of 76 votes. However, in the runoff round, Burrows gained significant ground. Twelve Democrats who had initially supported Rodriguez-Ramos switched their votes to Burrows, and he also picked up two more Republican votes from members who had defected from Cook. Nine members marked themselves present but refrained from voting, and one member was absent.
Burrows’ support from Democrats will undoubtedly become a key point of contention in the months ahead. For many Republicans, particularly those on the far right, the fact that the new speaker did not secure a majority of GOP votes is seen as a sign of weakness. Some conservatives are already promising to target Republicans who backed Burrows in the next primary elections. The Republican Party of Texas has also vowed to censure those who broke ranks with the insurgent wing, setting the stage for a heated intra-party battle in the near future.
The role of House speaker is not just symbolic—it holds real power in the legislative process. The speaker appoints committee chairs, influences the flow of legislation, and plays a critical role in shaping policy. Alongside the governor and lieutenant governor, the speaker is one of the “Big Three” leaders of Texas state government, wielding significant influence over the state’s legislative agenda. The dynamics between these three leaders are crucial for the success of any legislative session. When their relationships are harmonious, bills move through the legislature relatively smoothly. However, when tensions arise, as they did last session, the legislative process can come to a grinding halt.
In the previous session, the fractures between the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the speaker led to a series of record-breaking special sessions. Lawmakers returned to Austin four times to resolve disagreements over issues such as property tax cuts, immigration reform, teacher pay raises, and the contentious school voucher program. Despite the extended overtime sessions, lawmakers were unable to reach an agreement on a school voucher bill, which had been a key priority for Gov. Greg Abbott.
Abbott’s involvement in the primaries last year was a game-changer. The governor spent millions of his own campaign funds to target members of his own party who had failed to support his signature voucher bill. With his backing, a group of 79 staunch supporters of school choice were elected to the House, leading to optimism among voucher proponents that this session could finally see the passage of a voucher package.
Burrows, a vocal supporter of school vouchers, has expressed confidence that the political landscape has shifted in favor of such legislation. "The political winds have shifted, and the votes are there," he told the Tribune last month. He made it clear that he would not stand in the way of any voucher legislation that had the backing of the House, signaling that school choice advocates may soon see their goals realized.
However, the path forward remains uncertain. The deep divisions within the Republican Party, particularly between the establishment and insurgent factions, mean that Burrows will have to navigate a complex political landscape. While his victory as speaker is a personal triumph, it may come at the cost of deeper party unity. The question remains whether Burrows can effectively manage the competing interests within his own party, while also working with Democrats to pass meaningful legislation.
For now, Burrows' win is a sign of the enduring influence of the establishment wing of the Republican Party in Texas. Yet, with hardline conservatives vowing to continue their push for more conservative leadership, it is clear that the fight for control of the Texas House is far from over. This speaker's race, and the fallout from it, will likely shape the political landscape of Texas for years to come, making it one of the most pivotal moments in recent state legislative history.
Login