On Monday, February 3, 2025, employees of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) received a sudden and unexpected directive: they were instructed to stay away from their Washington headquarters. This order came after a jaw-dropping announcement from billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, who stated that President Donald Trump had agreed to shut down the agency. Staffers at USAID were left stunned, with over 600 employees reporting that they had been locked out of their computer systems overnight. Those who could still access the system were greeted with an email from the agency’s leadership, notifying them that the headquarters would be closed for the day.
This unusual turn of events follows Musk's earlier comments on a live session on X Spaces, where he shared that he had spoken directly with President Trump regarding USAID. Musk, who is leading a massive civilian review of the federal government, asserted that both he and Trump had come to the conclusion that the agency should be shut down for good. Musk's direct involvement in government affairs has stirred controversy, especially as he leads an operation called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This department's goal is to root out inefficiencies and waste within federal agencies—a mission that has brought Musk into direct conflict with USAID.
Musk’s criticism of USAID wasn’t subtle. He described the agency as being beyond repair, likening it to a rotten apple—one that couldn’t be saved by removing the worm inside. “It became apparent that it’s not an apple with a worm in it,” Musk explained, adding that USAID is more like “a ball of worms,” implying that the entire organization was irreparably broken. “We’re shutting it down,” he boldly declared, fueling further debate about the agency's future.
USAID, established over six decades ago, has long been responsible for overseeing U.S. humanitarian, development, and security programs in more than 120 countries around the globe. However, it has increasingly come under fire from Musk, Trump, and some Republican lawmakers. Their criticism has focused on the agency’s perceived promotion of liberal causes and its involvement in international development, which they claim has veered too far left. The announcement of its closure represents the latest salvo in a broader crackdown on federal agencies by the Trump administration.
Adding fuel to the fire, reports surfaced over the weekend that two top security chiefs at USAID were placed on leave after they reportedly refused to hand over classified materials from restricted areas to Musk’s government-inspection teams. This decision came after Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency made headlines with a similar operation at the Treasury Department, where it accessed sensitive information, including data related to Social Security and Medicare customer payments. These actions have sparked fierce debate, with Democratic lawmakers decrying Musk’s overreach and questioning the legality of his access to sensitive government-held data.
USAID's troubles have escalated in the past few years, especially under the Trump administration. It has been one of the primary targets of the current administration’s crackdown on what it sees as bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal federal programs. Trump has made no secret of his disdain for the agency, recently calling its leadership a "bunch of radical lunatics" and vowing to “get them out.” His comments have raised alarms among those who see this as a further erosion of government accountability and oversight.
The controversy surrounding USAID has reached a fever pitch as the agency’s website unexpectedly disappeared over the weekend. The unexplained disappearance of the site left many wondering about the true scope of the shutdown. With Trump’s hard-hitting stance against the agency, USAID has become a symbol of his administration’s broader efforts to scale back U.S. foreign aid and reduce the influence of what he views as liberal institutions. In fact, the Trump administration’s freeze on foreign assistance has already forced many aid organizations to lay off staff, leading to significant disruptions in the global aid sector.
Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has been largely absent from the conversation, is currently abroad in Central America, on his first trip overseas since taking office. Rubio has not yet publicly addressed the potential closure of USAID or any related developments, which has added another layer of uncertainty to the situation. His absence has fueled concerns among some lawmakers about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and aid efforts under the current administration.
Peter Marocco, a political appointee returning from Trump’s first term, has been identified as a key figure in enforcing the USAID shutdown. Employees within the agency have reported seeing unfamiliar faces around the Washington headquarters—individuals wearing visitors' badges and asking probing questions. These outsiders are believed to be members of Musk’s DOGE team, part of his wider initiative to streamline government functions and eliminate what he sees as wasteful programs.
The political fallout from these events has been swift and intense. Democratic lawmakers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, have strongly condemned Trump’s actions and Musk’s involvement in government oversight. Warren, in particular, criticized Musk’s access to personal information through his inspections, claiming that the move was a dangerous overreach. “We must do everything in our power to push back and protect people from harm,” she posted, though she did not provide specific details on how she planned to fight back.
The growing tension between the Trump administration and USAID, compounded by Musk’s increasingly prominent role in the government, is raising questions about the future of foreign aid and U.S. engagement abroad. Critics argue that the shutdown of USAID, if it goes through, could have severe consequences for the millions of people around the world who rely on U.S. assistance for development, humanitarian aid, and security programs.
The battle over USAID is more than just a policy dispute—it's a reflection of the broader ideological struggle within the United States over the role of government in global affairs. While Musk and Trump have framed their actions as efforts to eliminate waste and inefficiency, many on the left view these moves as part of a broader attack on international cooperation and the promotion of liberal values. The debate is far from over, and it seems likely that the future of USAID will be a key issue in the coming years.
For now, the closure of USAID’s headquarters is just the latest chapter in a saga that has drawn national attention. Whether or not the agency is truly shut down remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the stakes are high. With both domestic and international ramifications, this decision will have ripple effects far beyond Washington, D.C. The coming days and weeks will likely bring more twists and turns in this unprecedented showdown between the Trump administration, Musk’s DOGE team, and one of the most influential aid organizations in the world.
Login