Gender Divide: How Women Favor Harris and Men Back Trump in the Upcoming Election

Written by Published
 In the lead-up to a tightly contested election, Newsweek has revealed a fascinating gender divide among voters that could be pivotal in determining the outcome. An analysis of recent polls shows a pronounced split, with women voters gravitating toward Kamala Harris, while men strongly favor Donald Trump. This divide, which has steadily grown over the years, is particularly notable this year as both campaigns make their final push, hoping to sway undecided voters in a race that’s closer than ever.
 

Gender Gap by the Numbers

Since October 28, national polling data reviewed by Newsweek has highlighted that, on average, women support Harris by an 8-point margin, whereas men prefer Trump by 10 points. This means there’s a gender gap of around 9 points—a significant difference that could have major implications in this year’s election. To break it down further, 52% of female voters are inclined to vote for Harris, while 53% of male voters stand behind Trump. With these numbers, it's clear that gender will be a deciding factor in how this election plays out.

But it’s not just the overall numbers that paint a vivid picture. Recent individual polls illustrate even wider gaps. For instance, a poll conducted by J.L. Partners from October 26 to 29 showed male voters were 22 points more likely than female voters to support Trump. Women in this poll preferred Harris by a 14-point margin, which adds up to a staggering 18-point gender gap. Another poll by Quantus Insights, taken from October 27 to 30, revealed that men favored Trump by 13 points, while Harris led by 11 points among women, resulting in a 12-point gender divide. These numbers are staggering, and political analysts are watching closely to see how this gap may influence the outcome.

The Historic Gender Divide in Politics

The gender gap in U.S. politics isn't new—it’s been a staple since the 1980s when women began to lean more Democratic and men leaned Republican. What started as a small division has evolved into a powerful indicator of political allegiance, with each party strategically appealing to these differences. Experts believe this year’s gender gap could reach historic levels, especially among younger voters, where the divergence is even more striking.

Carrie Baker, a professor specializing in Women, Gender, and Sexuality at Smith College, underscored the weight of gender in this election, saying, “Whichever way this election goes, gender will be a critical factor in determining the outcome.” With polling showing that Harris has a slight 1-point national lead, and swing states showing margins as narrow as 2 points, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Every vote counts, and the outcome may hinge on whether Harris can draw enough support from women to counter Trump’s appeal among men.

Young Voters: A Generation Divided

Among younger voters, the gender gap is particularly stark. An analysis of recent New York Times/Siena College polls found that Trump leads Harris by a massive 21 points among young men, while Harris has an even more impressive 39-point lead among young women. The divide is also present within racial demographics: in a poll conducted by the Alliance for Black Equality from October 15 to 19, 35% of Gen Z Black men indicated support for Trump—the highest among Black voters surveyed. This poll had a margin of error of +/- 2.6% and included nearly 1,500 respondents.

Financial independence is an important factor driving these divisions. Young women today are increasingly out-earning their male counterparts, a phenomenon that contrasts sharply with past decades. A Pew Research Center study found that 39% of men believe that men are struggling more than women to secure well-paying jobs, a sentiment that resonates strongly among young Republican men. This sense of economic and social competition has led to a heightened appeal for Trump, who uses populist rhetoric to connect with these disillusioned young men.

Trump’s Unconventional Media Strategy

In this election cycle, Trump’s outreach efforts have leaned heavily on unconventional media platforms, particularly podcasts that appeal to younger male audiences. Trump has made appearances on shows like The Joe Rogan Experience, The Shawn Ryan Show, Theo Von's podcast, and Lex Fridman’s show, tapping into platforms with millions of young male viewers. This approach contrasts sharply with Harris, who notably declined an invitation to appear on Joe Rogan’s show, a move some analysts see as a missed opportunity.

Jackson Katz, co-founder of the Young Men’s Research Initiative, expressed disappointment in Harris' decision not to participate in these forums. “I was hoping she would go on the Joe Rogan Experience because it could have been a powerful statement to young men,” Katz told Newsweek. He believes that connecting with young men on platforms they trust could have opened new inroads for the Harris campaign, especially given Trump’s strong appeal among this demographic.

Populism and Gender: A Broader Social Context

Elisabeth Clemens, a Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago, sheds light on the undercurrents fueling Trump’s popularity among men. Clemens points to Trump’s reliance on populist rhetoric as a critical factor driving the gender gap. She notes that “populism speaks to those who are experiencing or anticipating status loss, whether that takes the form of the erosion of racial or gender privilege or the loss of a job or community standing.” Trump’s campaign promises, which emphasize the restoration of traditional family roles and male privilege, resonate deeply with men who feel left behind in the shifting social landscape.

In contrast, the Harris campaign has focused on job creation and home ownership, policies that appeal more broadly to both men and women, yet lack the specific cultural resonance Trump brings to young men. According to a 2020 survey by Pew Research Center, 23% of men—and 33% of men who supported Trump—felt that the advancement of women has come at their expense. This sentiment underlies much of the populist appeal that Trump leverages, allowing him to tap into feelings of disenfranchisement among men.

Early Voting: A Beacon of Hope for Harris?

With early voting data showing Democrats leading by 2 points, Harris' campaign sees a glimmer of hope. According to early voting statistics, 54% of early voters are women, suggesting that women may indeed turn out in record numbers for Harris. If this trend continues, it could counteract Trump’s male voter base, providing the edge Harris needs. However, early voting data only reveals party affiliation, not actual votes, making it hard to predict with certainty.

Katz, reflecting on this, shared that the challenge for Trump is to inspire more young men to vote. “If enough young men can see through the Trump campaign's efforts to exploit their vulnerability to cartoonish masculinity appeals, it could make the difference,” he said. The Harris campaign, meanwhile, hopes that high female voter turnout will sustain their lead as election day approaches.

A Critical Moment for the Future

As the final days wind down, the gender divide in this election encapsulates the stark contrasts in American society today. It highlights not just differences in political preferences but the broader cultural and economic dynamics that influence these choices. From the appeal of populist promises to the impact of evolving economic roles, these gendered voting patterns are a telling indicator of deeper societal shifts.

With a razor-thin margin separating the candidates, one thing is clear: the power of gender in shaping this election's outcome is undeniable. Whichever way the vote swings, the divide between male and female voters will provide a lasting impact on American political landscapes, reflecting the unique struggles, aspirations, and hopes of each gender. As we watch the results unfold, the legacy of this gender gap will resonate far beyond election night, influencing policy discussions and campaign strategies for years to come.