Every time a baby is born in Louisiana, there’s more than a 60% chance that taxpayers will foot the bill through Medicaid. Similarly, in Republican Rep. David Valadao’s central California district, six out of ten people rely on Medicaid for their doctor visits and emergency room trips. Meanwhile, in Alaska—one of the most expensive places for health care—one-third of the population depends on Medicaid for coverage.
Despite Medicaid historically being a program many Republicans sought to shrink, several GOP lawmakers, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Rep. Valadao, have recently taken a stand in defending it. This shift marks a surprising departure from traditional Republican policies that have long sought to curb government-funded social welfare programs. With a looming partial government shutdown, many conservative lawmakers find themselves in a tough spot. Deep cuts to Medicaid could prove politically disastrous back home, where many of their constituents rely on it for essential health care services.
The Battle Over Medicaid: GOP’s Dilemma
-
Republicans have already ruled out major cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
-
The party is looking to slash up to $880 billion from Medicaid over the next decade.
-
These cuts would help finance $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, but they could leave millions vulnerable.
Speaker Mike Johnson, who previously supported measures to restructure Medicaid, now insists that the focus will be on rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse—though experts argue that won’t deliver the massive savings Republicans are hoping for. Medicaid, jointly funded by the states and the federal government, currently provides near-free health care coverage to about 80 million low-income and disabled Americans, including millions of children. In 2023 alone, the program cost $880 billion to operate.
GOP Resistance Against Medicaid Cuts
The resistance isn’t just coming from constituents—it’s also from Republican lawmakers themselves.
-
Minnesota GOP lawmakers recently warned the president that cutting Medicaid too deeply would be "unmanageable."
-
Nevada’s Republican Governor Joe Lombardo sent a letter to Congress, stating that the proposed reductions "would put lives at risk."
-
Alaska’s state Senate Majority Leader Cathy Giessel, a Republican and nurse, voiced "huge concerns" over Medicaid cuts during a speech on the Senate floor.
Nationally, public sentiment appears to align with these GOP concerns. According to a January poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, 55% of Americans believe the government spends too little on Medicaid. Drew Altman, president of the health care research firm KFF, noted that the program has become deeply embedded in American society, with nearly half the population reporting that they or a family member have relied on Medicaid at some point.
Trump’s Take: “We’re Not Going to Touch It”
Former President Donald Trump made his position crystal clear: "We’re not going to touch it." This statement seemingly distances him from his party’s long-held stance on Medicaid reductions. Trump has historically pushed for lowering government spending on health care, but his previous attempts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) failed. Even now, his latest campaign offers only vague "concepts of a plan" for health care reform.
What’s Next? Potential GOP Strategies
Though outright Medicaid cuts are politically risky, some Republicans are exploring alternative cost-saving measures:
-
Work Requirements – Some GOP-led states have already started implementing them. This could save up to $109 billion over the next decade.
-
Cuts in Benefits or Coverage – Lawmakers may consider reducing the scope of services Medicaid covers.
-
Eliminating Provider Taxes – States often use these to help finance Medicaid, and removing them could shift more costs to the states.
However, Democrats are warning that any reductions could have dire consequences. In response to Republican proposals, a new seven-figure TV ad campaign is set to launch in 20 congressional districts. The ads claim that hospitals could close, and millions might lose coverage if Medicaid is slashed to fund tax breaks for billionaires like Elon Musk.
The Bigger Picture: Health Care vs. Tax Cuts
Michael Cannon, a director of health studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, argues that Medicaid is a major contributor to the nation’s growing debt and is in desperate need of reform. However, he criticizes the GOP’s approach, noting that their focus appears to be on funding tax cuts rather than improving health care efficiency.
“The only reason for the cuts right now is to pay for the tax cuts,” Cannon said. “None of them are talking about the need to do better health reform.”
With growing internal opposition and public scrutiny, the Republican Party finds itself at a crossroads. Will they push forward with Medicaid reductions to fund tax cuts, or will they heed the concerns of their constituents and fellow lawmakers? One thing is clear—Medicaid is no longer just a social welfare issue; it’s a political battlefield shaping the future of American health care policy.
Login