Historian Allan Lichtman, renowned for his almost impeccable track record in predicting U.S. presidential elections, has made a bold claim: Kamala Harris will become the next president of the United States. His prediction comes as a surprise twist to the ongoing political discourse, considering his previous stance that President Joe Biden shouldn't drop out of the race. Yet, now, Lichtman seems to believe Harris has a better shot at winning the upcoming election than former President Donald Trump.
Before diving deeper into Lichtman’s reasoning, it’s important to highlight his impressive track record. Since 1984, Lichtman has successfully predicted 9 out of the last 10 presidential elections using his unique model known as the "Keys to the White House." These predictions aren't based on polling data or the latest political chatter, but instead on a system of 13 true-or-false questions. Lichtman’s model has gained widespread attention, as it focuses on the fundamental strengths and weaknesses of the candidates and their parties, rather than relying on short-term trends.
What Makes Harris the Front-runner?
Lichtman’s prediction centers around several key factors, which he believes give Harris the edge over Trump. In his recent interview with The New York Times, he outlined why his model favors the Vice President. According to him, eight out of the 13 “keys” work in Harris’ favor. These include everything from economic conditions to the absence of social unrest surrounding her campaign.
Harris, Lichtman argues, is not burdened by scandals or ongoing social turmoil that could derail her candidacy. This is a stark contrast to Trump, who has faced numerous controversies during and after his presidency. Furthermore, Harris doesn’t have to endure the challenges of a primary contest, which Lichtman sees as a significant advantage. Her party has rallied around her following Biden's decision to step down, and she has effectively secured endorsements without facing any major internal conflicts.
One of the most crucial aspects of Lichtman’s analysis is that Harris' competition – namely Trump – has limited appeal. While Trump has a loyal base, Lichtman suggests that his reach doesn't extend much beyond it. This narrow base could hinder Trump’s ability to win over undecided voters or those outside his core demographic, which may be crucial in a national election.
Why Harris Over Trump?
The historian's reasoning against Trump is based on what he describes as three "keys" that Trump holds. First, Trump is not facing an incumbent, which historically makes it easier for a challenger to gain traction. Second, Harris, while a competent candidate, isn’t seen as a "once-in-a-generation" leader who inspires massive, unprecedented support, according to Lichtman’s interpretation. Lastly, the Democratic Party's loss of the House in the 2022 midterms could be seen as a sign of electoral vulnerability.
However, Lichtman makes it clear that these three factors are heavily outweighed by Harris' advantages. Beyond simply not being Trump, Harris stands to benefit from the Biden administration’s legislative achievements and favorable economic conditions, which are both essential keys in Lichtman’s model. With no third-party challengers after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suspended his campaign, Harris appears to have a clearer path forward.
Another vital point Lichtman highlights is that foreign policy – usually a critical component in elections – won’t be as decisive this time around. While Trump might argue that Harris lacks foreign policy successes or faces failures, Lichtman says this won’t change the outcome. Even if these keys were stacked against Harris, Trump would still only have five favorable keys, not enough to win the election by Lichtman’s calculation.
A Slight Shift in Prediction?
Lichtman’s forecast for Harris marks a noticeable change from his earlier position. Back in July, he told The Wall Street Journal that sticking with Biden would be the Democrats’ best bet to keep the White House. At the time, he explained that Biden’s incumbency was a valuable asset, as it checked off two of the keys in his prediction model. “Biden running checks off two keys right. Biden steps aside, they lose obviously the incumbency,” he said.
Yet, as the political landscape has evolved, so too has Lichtman’s assessment. While Biden’s decision to bow out initially seemed like it might throw the Democrats into disarray, Harris has managed to avoid a primary fight, quickly uniting the party behind her. This swift consolidation of support, coupled with Biden’s endorsement, has likely played a role in Lichtman’s revised prediction.
The Man Behind the Model
It's worth taking a step back to appreciate Lichtman’s expertise and the model that has earned him such acclaim. The “Keys to the White House” system evaluates elections through a historical lens, breaking down presidential races into 13 indicators that are either true or false for the incumbent party. These keys cover a range of factors, from incumbency and third-party candidates to social unrest and economic performance.
What makes Lichtman’s approach stand out is its simplicity and focus on the big picture. Instead of getting caught up in polling data, day-to-day campaign strategies, or momentary gaffes, Lichtman looks at the structural factors that historically decide elections. It’s a method that has worked exceptionally well for him – with one notable exception.
In the 2000 election, Lichtman predicted a win for Al Gore, only to see George W. Bush take the presidency after a contentious recount and Supreme Court decision. That remains the only presidential race Lichtman has misjudged, a testament to the reliability of his model over the years.
Harris' Unique Position
Kamala Harris now stands at a pivotal moment in U.S. political history. If Lichtman’s prediction holds true, she could become the first woman, the first Black woman, and the first South Asian American to hold the office of President. This historic possibility alone makes her candidacy particularly exciting, but it's bolstered by her ability to navigate the complexities of modern politics.
Despite facing criticism during her vice presidency and skepticism from some corners of her own party, Harris has steadily built a case for herself as the future leader of the Democratic Party. Her role in championing key legislative victories, her background as a prosecutor, and her experience on the global stage as vice president all provide a solid foundation for her presidential run.
And while the road ahead won’t be easy, Lichtman’s prediction gives Harris a significant vote of confidence. If she can continue to unite the Democratic Party and capitalize on the advantages identified in the "Keys to the White House," Harris could indeed make history in November.
A Word of Caution
While Lichtman’s predictions are often accurate, they aren’t foolproof. As mentioned, the 2000 election still serves as a reminder that unforeseen events can change the trajectory of an election. Moreover, campaigns are dynamic and unpredictable, with new developments constantly reshaping the political landscape.
Still, Lichtman’s track record offers an optimistic outlook for Harris. As the election nears, all eyes will be on how she handles the inevitable challenges of the campaign trail. Will Harris be able to turn Lichtman’s prediction into a reality? Only time will tell, but for now, she has history – and one of America’s most trusted election forecasters – on her side.
Login