In a recent podcast appearance, Jon Stewart laughed off the idea that the Democratic Party needs its own version of Joe Rogan. The suggestion, he remarked, typically comes from people who haven't actually listened to Rogan's podcast. In fact, Stewart's take on this popular notion is quite the opposite—he believes Democrats could stand to learn from the curiosity and open-mindedness that Rogan exhibits on his show.
It all started when Stewart appeared on his own podcast, The Weekly Show, and responded to a listener's question. The question, passed along by his producer, Brittany Mehmedovic, asked who might serve as the Democratic counterpart to Joe Rogan. Stewart didn’t just brush off the suggestion—he explained why it's a flawed idea, especially for those who haven’t truly engaged with Rogan's work.
"I think that's oversimplifying Joe Rogan," Stewart said, shaking his head. "As someone who actually listens to Joe Rogan, I can tell you he's not just a partisan figure. His ideas are all over the map." According to Stewart, Rogan's show isn't so much a platform for pushing a specific political agenda, but rather a space for free-flowing conversations. Some of the ideas Rogan shares may align with progressive viewpoints, while others might lean more conservative. Stewart's point is that Rogan’s podcast isn't neatly boxed into one political lane, which is something many people fail to recognize.
While Stewart doesn’t deny that Rogan’s massive popularity has led to some strong political connections—most notably, his support for President Donald Trump—he argues that the conversation should be more nuanced. Rogan's audience, largely made up of young men, has been a key demographic in recent political cycles. In fact, Rogan made headlines during the 2020 election cycle when, after months of staying neutral, he gave a solid endorsement to Trump. This sparked a wave of responses from Democrats who questioned whether they needed someone like Rogan to draw in the younger vote.
Rogan’s political leanings are anything but static. Back in 2020, he threw his weight behind Bernie Sanders, a progressive candidate. But by 2024, Rogan was firmly supporting Trump's re-election bid. This shift in allegiances, combined with the controversial figures he frequently hosts—like Matt Walsh and Ben Shapiro—has drawn criticism from liberals who feel that Rogan is providing a platform to individuals who espouse problematic views, particularly on race and gender.
But Stewart’s criticism of the idea that Democrats need their own version of Joe Rogan goes beyond just politics. He believes that the suggestion oversimplifies the entire purpose of Rogan’s show. For Stewart, Rogan’s podcast is an example of what it means to engage with people from all sides of the political spectrum. It's not about aligning with a single ideology but about fostering discussion and engaging in debates that cross boundaries.
"I think Bernie made the right call going on Joe Rogan," Stewart said, referencing Bernie Sanders’ 2019 appearance on the podcast. "It wasn’t about agreeing with Rogan on everything, but about reaching out to a broad audience." For Stewart, Sanders’ decision to join Rogan on his platform wasn’t just a strategic move—it was a demonstration of how to reach people who may not necessarily share your political beliefs, but who are open to listening and learning.
Stewart also pointed out that many of the people who advocate for Democrats to replicate Rogan’s style are simply missing the point. "These are the people who’ve never really sat down and listened to him," he remarked. To truly understand Rogan’s appeal, one must look beyond his political affiliations and acknowledge the depth of the conversations he has with a wide range of guests, from politicians to entertainers to scientists.
Bernie Sanders himself echoed similar sentiments when he addressed the notion that Rogan is some sort of dangerous figure. Appearing on CNN's State of the Union, Sanders dismissed the idea that Democrats should avoid engaging with Rogan due to his conservative views or controversial guests. "Look, you’re going to have an argument with Rogan—agree with him, disagree with him—but why not go on the show?" Sanders asked. "I just don’t get why there's this issue."
What both Stewart and Sanders seem to agree on is that engaging with people who don't necessarily share your views is important, especially in today's polarized climate. It’s not about finding someone to mimic Joe Rogan's success but about embracing the idea of meaningful dialogue. And frankly, that’s what Stewart believes Democrats could learn from Rogan’s show. It's not about building a media personality who parrots a certain ideology but about engaging with curiosity, asking questions, and offering space for complex ideas.
While it’s true that Joe Rogan’s podcast has become a cultural juggernaut, attracting millions of listeners, it's crucial to remember that his influence goes beyond politics. Rogan is a master of conversation, and part of his appeal is that he talks to people with genuine curiosity, regardless of their political or social affiliations. That kind of approach is something that could benefit anyone, Democrat or Republican, and is a far more valuable asset than trying to replicate his success with a media personality who simply mirrors his style.
So, what does this all mean for the Democratic Party? Rather than chasing after a Joe Rogan look-alike, perhaps they should focus on embracing the qualities that have made Rogan successful: curiosity, openness, and a willingness to engage with a wide range of people. It’s not about finding a spokesperson who only speaks to one side of the political spectrum but about creating a space for robust, nuanced discussions that reflect the diversity of perspectives in the country.
In conclusion, Jon Stewart’s dismissal of the idea that Democrats need their own version of Joe Rogan is more than just a critique of the notion. It’s a call for more authentic conversations and a reminder that true engagement happens when people are willing to step outside their ideological comfort zones. For the Democratic Party, the real takeaway is this: Instead of trying to emulate someone else's success, focus on building meaningful dialogues that resonate with people on all sides of the political spectrum. And maybe, just maybe, the Democrats will find their own version of success—not by mimicking Rogan, but by embracing the spirit of curiosity that he embodies.
Login