On the domestic front, Harris’s speech promised a series of bold initiatives aimed at revitalizing the middle class. She spoke of a middle-class tax cut, an end to America’s persistent housing shortage, and a commitment to securing the southern border. However, while her speech was well-received and tougher in tone than many had anticipated, it was notably light on the specifics. It left many wondering just how she plans to turn these broad principles into concrete actions.
Harris’s somewhat vague approach to policy may, in part, be a strategic choice. After all, she only became the Democratic candidate a month ago, stepping in after President Joe Biden bowed out of the race under mounting pressure from within his party. With such a short time to craft detailed plans, it seems Harris and her team have decided to keep some of their cards close to the chest. By not offering too many specifics, they avoid giving the Trump campaign additional ammunition for attacks. This strategy of “strategic ambiguity,” as it’s been dubbed, is particularly evident on contentious issues like energy policy, where clear stances could easily become fodder for Republican critiques.
But this tactic may not hold up indefinitely. With only 75 days left until Election Day, there is increasing pressure on Harris to provide more concrete details about her plans. Voters want to know more than just the broad strokes—they’re looking for specifics on how she intends to make their lives better. As Chauncey McLean, the founder of Future Forward, a super PAC backing Harris, put it earlier this week, voters are asking, “What’s her plan? What’s she going to do? And specifically, what is she going to do to make my life better?”
Harris’s journey to this point has been anything but straightforward. A former California attorney general and U.S. senator, she launched a bid for the White House four years ago, only to see her campaign fizzle out before the primaries. Back then, Harris struggled to find a consistent message, often changing her tactics on the fly with little effect. But this time around, she’s managed to strike a more successful balance, positioning herself as both a continuation of the Biden administration and a fresh face for a new generation. This dual approach has helped her gain ground against Trump in the polls, turning what was once a foregone conclusion into a tightly contested race.
Despite the newfound momentum, Harris’s campaign has already faced its share of attacks from Trump and his allies. When Harris unveiled an economic plan aimed at curbing grocery store price gouging, Trump was quick to dismiss it as socialism, branding Harris as “Comrade Kamala.” He was equally critical of her speech at the Democratic Convention, taking to social media to declare, “No specific policies, ALL TALK, NO ACTION.”
Adding to the complexities of Harris’s campaign is her shift on key issues that were central to her 2020 presidential bid. Back then, she was a vocal supporter of a ban on hydraulic fracking and advocated for a single-payer health care system, commonly known as Medicare for All. However, in her current run, she has distanced herself from these positions, perhaps recognizing the political risks they carry in a general election.
As the campaign enters its final stretch, Harris is gearing up for a series of high-stakes events that could make or break her chances. This includes at least one televised debate against Trump in September, where she will undoubtedly face intense scrutiny over her policy positions. Additionally, she is expected to participate in one-on-one national interviews, where the pressure to provide more policy specifics will only intensify.
In the coming weeks, Harris will crisscross the country, focusing her efforts on key battleground states like Arizona, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. These states are pivotal in determining the outcome of the election, and Harris’s ability to connect with voters there could be the deciding factor.
At the convention in Chicago, U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer captured the mood of a party more focused on defeating Trump than delving into policy minutiae. Just before addressing a group of climate activists, Schumer was asked whether Harris needed to present a more detailed climate agenda in the weeks ahead. His response was simple: “People should have a lot of faith. She’s going to be a great environmental president.”
This sentiment was echoed by many of the party faithful in Chicago. When asked about Harris’s lack of detailed policy proposals, some simply shrugged their shoulders. Others questioned why the media wasn’t holding Trump to the same standard. Among the two dozen attendees interviewed, none expressed any real concern about Harris’s approach.
“Compared to the other guy, give me a break,” said U.S. Representative Jim Costa after attending an event at Chicago’s famed Second City comedy club, hosted by moderate Democrats. “He’s talking about electric boats and sharks and how he’s better looking. Give me a break.”
Former New Jersey Congressman Tom Malinowski offered a similar perspective, arguing that voters aren’t going to be swayed by which candidate has the most finely tuned policy positions. “What they do know, or should know, is that you’ve got one candidate who believes climate change is real and a threat, and that America can and should be leading the world to clean energy, and another candidate who doesn’t give a damn,” he said.
As Harris moves closer to Election Day, the pressure will only mount for her to define her policy positions more clearly. But for now, her campaign appears content to ride the wave of enthusiasm and focus on the big picture—defeating Donald Trump.
Login