VP Kamala Harris: Navigating Media in a Modern Campaign Landscape
“DON’T CALL IT A ‘MEDIA BLITZ’ — After steering clear of mainstream media for the majority of her campaign, VP KAMALA HARRIS is … still largely avoiding the media,” quipped the authors of Playbook. This observation captures the essence of Harris's media strategy, sparking a debate about how political figures engage (or don’t engage) with traditional news outlets versus newer platforms.
The term "legacy media," often synonymous with "mainstream media," refers to well-established news organizations such as CNN, The New York Times, and Fox News. Politico has taken Harris to task, suggesting she prefers to engage with alternative venues, such as podcasts and late-night talk shows, rather than face the scrutiny of legacy media. The latest media schedule from Harris's team has amplified these concerns. She is set to appear on CBS News' “60 Minutes” on Monday and will host a Univision town hall in Nevada on Thursday. This follows her recent interview on the wildly popular sex and dating podcast, “Call Her Daddy,” which aired Sunday. Harris is also lined up for appearances on “The View,” “The Howard Stern Show,” and “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” later this week.
While the authors of Playbook acknowledge that interviews like the one on “60 Minutes” and the Univision town hall could provide valuable insights for voters, they raise eyebrows at her choice of other platforms. They argue, “Let’s be real here: Most of these are not the types of interviews that are going to press her on issues she may not want to talk about, even as voters want more specifics from Harris.” This highlights a critical tension in today’s media landscape: the demand for substantive discussions versus the allure of engaging with non-traditional platforms.
Politico's primary concern appears to be that Harris is not doing voters a service by avoiding hard-hitting interviews with traditional news outlets. Yet, it’s essential to consider who truly cares about these criticisms. Individuals consuming exclusive interviews with Harris are likely already engaged voters, perhaps even leaning toward their preferred candidate. The voters who remain undecided or disengaged might find their way to the polls through platforms like “Call Her Daddy,” rather than by tuning into a conventional political interview.
Harris seems to be capitalizing on a strategic approach, particularly when her opponent in this election is Donald Trump. Given that many voters will select her solely based on the fact that she is not Trump, engaging with less politically engaged audiences is a shrewd move. The fact that “Call Her Daddy” ranks as the fifth-most popular podcast on Spotify raises the question: Isn’t it worth Harris's time to connect with that substantial audience?
Critics argue that Harris is dodging critical inquiries that potential voters want answers to. However, she has been proactive in addressing key issues. CBS News recently teased a segment of Harris's interview on “60 Minutes,” showcasing her discussing her proposed economic policies. This leads to an essential query: What difficult questions is she allegedly avoiding? Politico fails to provide concrete examples.
So, here’s a provocative question: Who really cares? The notion that a presidential candidate is neglecting interviews with traditional outlets that have long enjoyed exclusive access to such figures seems pretentious and somewhat misguided. It raises the question of whether this expectation is in tune with the current political climate. In reality, the appeal for Harris to engage with these outlets, only to face a barrage of tough questions, doesn’t seem like a compelling argument.
During my college days in journalism classes, we often discussed a common pitfall among journalists: an annoying sense of superiority. This kind of self-importance is palpable in the criticisms directed at Harris. The irony of this situation lies in the fact that while Harris is facing scrutiny for her media strategy, her opponent, Trump, is mentioned not once in the Politico newsletter. Trump consistently opts for friendly media outlets, evading those that might challenge him. He was even invited to participate in “60 Minutes” and chose to decline. This inconsistency raises questions about why Democratic candidates are often criticized for not adhering to traditional media engagement norms when their Republican counterparts are afforded the same liberties.
For the first time, it appears that the Democrats have a candidate who truly grasps the fundamental changes Trump has ushered into U.S. politics. The landscape of political media is evolving, indicating that legacy outlets may hold less significance in future elections. This shift likely explains Politico's somewhat petulant tone.
The New Media Strategy: Reaching Voters Where They Are
In today’s fast-paced digital world, the way candidates interact with voters is rapidly transforming. It’s no longer just about traditional interviews on television; candidates like Harris are recognizing the importance of engaging with audiences on platforms where they spend their time. The fact that Harris is prioritizing shows and podcasts that attract younger, more diverse audiences is a testament to her campaign’s savvy approach.
Appearing on popular shows allows Harris to reach demographics that may not engage with conventional news outlets. This strategy fosters a connection with voters who might otherwise remain indifferent to political discourse. It’s not just about answering tough questions but creating a relatable narrative that resonates with the everyday experiences of Americans.
Moreover, by focusing on platforms that prioritize entertainment, Harris can communicate her messages in a manner that is engaging and relatable, stripping away the staid and often dry format of traditional political interviews. This approach is not without its critics, but it is increasingly becoming a necessary strategy in the modern political arena.
The Landscape of Political Media: Evolving Dynamics
The ongoing transformation of political media reflects broader societal changes in how people consume information. Traditional outlets, while still influential, are no longer the only game in town. With the rise of social media and alternative platforms, candidates can directly engage with voters, bypassing the intermediaries of legacy media. This evolution poses both challenges and opportunities for political figures.
For instance, platforms like podcasts offer a unique advantage: they allow for longer, more nuanced conversations. Unlike traditional interviews, which often focus on sound bites and quick responses, podcasts create an environment for deeper discussions. Harris's appearance on “Call Her Daddy” is a prime example of this. Engaging with listeners in this way humanizes candidates and makes them more approachable.
Additionally, the accessibility of online platforms means that candidates can reach niche audiences that traditional media may overlook. In a diverse and polarized electorate, catering to different segments of the population can be crucial for electoral success.
Conclusion: Navigating the Media Maze
In the end, VP Kamala Harris's media strategy is not just about avoiding tough questions; it's a calculated decision to engage with voters where they are. By choosing to focus on platforms that resonate with younger audiences and those less engaged in traditional politics, she is crafting a narrative that is both relevant and impactful.
As we navigate this new political landscape, it’s essential to recognize that the rules of engagement have shifted. Legacy media may still hold sway, but the growing importance of alternative platforms cannot be ignored. Candidates must adapt to this evolving environment, understanding that the way they communicate can significantly influence voter perception and engagement.
Critics may continue to bemoan Harris's avoidance of traditional interviews, but in doing so, they risk overlooking the changing dynamics of political media. For better or worse, the landscape is transforming, and those who adapt may find greater success in reaching voters. As we move closer to the election, it will be fascinating to see how these strategies play out and how voters respond to this new era of political engagement.
Login