The controversy surrounding Pete Hegseth, President Trump’s embattled defense secretary, has reached a fever pitch, with political infighting, mass firings, and accusations of leaks about sensitive military operations. Despite the growing chaos, President Trump has remained steadfast in his support of Hegseth, calling him a capable leader and insisting he is “doing a great job.” However, as the turmoil within the Pentagon deepens, some Republican lawmakers are starting to question how much longer Trump can afford to stand by his increasingly isolated and defiant Cabinet pick.
The Pentagon’s top brass is understandably concerned about the breakdown of Hegseth’s inner circle, especially when it comes to national security. With accusations swirling that Hegseth revealed sensitive military operation details to his wife, brother, and personal lawyer, many are wondering how his leadership will hold up in a real emergency. Yet, as one source close to Trump put it, the president tends to express unwavering loyalty to his team—until he doesn't. “You’ll hear about it on Twitter the next day,” the source remarked, highlighting Trump’s unpredictable nature.
For his part, Hegseth, a former Fox News personality and National Guard veteran, strongly defended himself outside the White House. He dismissed the media’s reporting as "a bunch of hit pieces," which he claimed were planted by former officials he had fired for allegedly leaking information. He accused these anonymous sources of colluding with journalists to smear his reputation. "It’s not going to work with me," Hegseth declared, emphasizing that he and Trump were “on the same page all the way.”
The New York Times published an explosive report on Sunday, revealing that Hegseth shared critical details about a bombing campaign in Yemen with a select group, including his wife, brother, and lawyer. The information, which was shared via the encrypted messaging app Signal, was highly sensitive. This disclosure came at a time when another controversy was brewing—Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Waltz, had accidentally included an Atlantic magazine editor in a separate Signal group, where more classified information about the Yemen strikes was discussed.
These incidents are not isolated. Back in March, a report surfaced claiming that Elon Musk was about to receive a briefing containing secrets about U.S. military strategy in the event of a war with China. This stirred concern within the White House, prompting Trump to intervene and question the validity of the report. The administration dismissed the story as inaccurate, even as investigations into potential leaks within the Pentagon began to unfold.
The fallout from these leaks, especially the Signal controversy, has caused deepening rifts within the Pentagon. Senior aides and Hegseth’s team have become increasingly paranoid, and a sense of distrust has permeated the highest levels of the Department of Defense. This discord only escalated when the Atlantic published its exposé, shedding more light on the situation. In response, three senior defense officials—Dan Caldwell, Colin Carroll, and Darin Selnick—were ousted for allegedly leaking information to the media.
The firings sparked outrage. Caldwell, a former colleague of Hegseth who had been brought on to the team, publicly defended himself, insisting that he had not leaked any information. In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Caldwell criticized the lack of transparency surrounding the investigation, saying that he hadn’t even been subjected to a polygraph test or asked to provide his phone for an examination. He went as far as to suggest that the leak investigation was “weaponized” against him and his colleagues.
Hegseth’s team didn’t stop there. They began to push for the removal of his chief of staff, Joe Kasper, amid ongoing tensions. Kasper, who had served in this role, was reportedly slated to be reassigned within the Pentagon, though the details remain unclear. The move, first reported by Politico, adds another layer of uncertainty to Hegseth’s leadership.
John Ullyot, a former spokesman for Hegseth, also spoke out, expressing doubts about Hegseth’s ability to effectively lead the Pentagon. Ullyot, who had been removed from his position after concerns about his judgment, painted a picture of utter chaos at the Department of Defense. He emphasized that Trump, who had appointed Hegseth, deserved better than this.
In response to the mounting criticism, Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for Trump, claimed that Hegseth was the victim of an orchestrated campaign to undermine him from within the Pentagon. She suggested that “the entire Pentagon” was working to sabotage Hegseth’s efforts and that his problems were part of a broader effort to destabilize his leadership.
Looking ahead, Hegseth seems determined to shore up his team, planning to bring in Marine Corps Colonel Ricky Buria, who had been serving as his junior military assistant, as a senior adviser. Some reports even suggest that Buria could take on the role of chief of staff or deputy chief of staff. However, Buria’s transition out of the Marine Corps is raising eyebrows, especially given that he had only been promoted to his current rank in the fall. Without a waiver, Buria may have to revert to his previous rank upon retirement, which could complicate his new role.
Amid the drama, Rep. Don Bacon, a retired Air Force general from Nebraska, weighed in on the controversy. He condemned Hegseth’s handling of sensitive military information, stating that if a Democrat had been in Hegseth’s position, there would be calls for accountability. Bacon argued that the military must always prioritize operational security, regardless of party affiliation.
So, what’s next for Pete Hegseth and his controversial tenure as defense secretary? Will President Trump continue to back him as the Pentagon turmoil intensifies? It’s clear that the unfolding drama within the Defense Department is far from over. From allegations of leaks and betrayal to the reshuffling of key personnel, the situation is becoming a political and security crisis that could have far-reaching consequences.
Login