In a bold move that has captured the attention of many, President Joe Biden recently made headlines by commuting the sentences of 37 individuals who were facing death row. This significant action, announced by the White House in a press release, means that these individuals' sentences will be changed from the ultimate punishment—execution—to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This decision marks a clear stance on the ongoing conversation about the death penalty and reflects the administration's efforts to make meaningful changes within the criminal justice system.
For many, this raises the question: What exactly does it mean to commute someone's sentence? In legal terms, commuting a sentence means that the punishment handed down to an individual is reduced or altered, though the underlying conviction remains in place. In this case, those affected by Biden's decision will no longer face execution, but they will serve life sentences instead.
This move comes as Biden approaches the final weeks of his presidency, and it also serves as a reiteration of the promises made during his campaign—namely, his goal to place a moratorium on the federal death penalty. This action underscores a significant shift in how the U.S. government approaches capital punishment, with a focus on rehabilitation and justice reform rather than retribution.
A Closer Look at Commuting Sentences
Commutations are a form of clemency that can be granted by a president to individuals convicted of federal crimes. However, it’s important to understand the differences between commuting a sentence and issuing a pardon. While both involve reducing or altering a punishment, a commutation merely reduces the severity of a sentence—like turning a death sentence into life imprisonment—but does not change the conviction itself. On the other hand, a pardon is an official forgiveness that eliminates both the punishment and the conviction, restoring the individual's civil rights.
When it comes to federal cases, the president is the only person with the authority to commute sentences. This power is granted to them by the U.S. Constitution, and it is typically used in cases where an individual’s sentence seems overly harsh, or where there are extenuating circumstances such as old age, terminal illness, or evidence of rehabilitation.
The Scope of Biden’s Decision
The 37 individuals whose sentences were commuted were originally facing execution under federal law. These commutations will change their status to life in prison without parole. Importantly, this action does not extend to individuals convicted of crimes such as terrorism or mass murder, which often carry sentences that are seen as non-negotiable due to the nature of the crimes.
Among the individuals who remain on death row under federal jurisdiction are some high-profile cases that have sparked intense public debate. Dylann Roof, for example, was sentenced to death for the 2015 massacre at the Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, where nine innocent lives were tragically lost. Similarly, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was convicted for his role in the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, and Robert Bowers, who killed 11 people at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018, still face the death penalty.
While these individuals remain on death row, Biden’s commutation of the other 37 sentences has been hailed as a bold step in the ongoing debate about the death penalty in the United States. It signals a broader commitment to criminal justice reform, with a focus on fairness, humanity, and the potential for second chances.
The Legal Grounds for Commuting Sentences
So, what are the legal grounds on which a sentence might be commuted? According to the Legal Information Institute, there are several factors that might warrant a commutation, such as advanced age, terminal illness, or a sentence that seems disproportionate to the crime, particularly when compared to similar cases. For instance, if new information or evidence comes to light that casts doubt on the fairness of the trial or sentencing, a commutation might be considered.
One of the most powerful arguments for commuting a sentence is the concept of rehabilitation. If an individual has shown remorse, changed their behavior, and taken steps to better themselves while incarcerated, they may be seen as deserving of a reduced sentence. President Biden has been particularly vocal about the importance of rehabilitation, and this is reflected in his approach to clemency.
Biden’s Legacy of Clemency
President Biden has already made a name for himself as one of the most active presidents in terms of issuing clemency. According to a White House press release, Biden has granted more commutations in his first term than any other U.S. president. Just this month alone, he has issued clemency to nearly 1,500 individuals, including 39 pardons for people convicted of nonviolent crimes.
This clemency spree is part of a broader push for criminal justice reform, an area where Biden has shown a clear commitment. Among the individuals granted clemency are those convicted for nonviolent drug-related offenses and, notably, those who were convicted of crimes related to marijuana possession or use. Biden made history by becoming the first president to issue pardons to individuals convicted of marijuana-related offenses, signaling a shift in how the country views drug policy.
Additionally, Biden’s administration has also granted clemency to former LGBTQI+ service members who were convicted of crimes based on their sexual orientation. This move is seen as a step toward correcting past injustices and acknowledging the sacrifices made by these individuals during a time when their service was not fully recognized or appreciated.
The State-Level Debate
While President Biden can issue pardons or commute sentences at the federal level, the death penalty remains a deeply divisive issue at the state level. As of today, 23 states have abolished the death penalty, with several others, such as California, Oregon, and Pennsylvania, having declared a moratorium on executions.
On the other hand, Texas remains one of the staunchest supporters of capital punishment. As one of 27 states that still retain the death penalty, Texas is known for its frequent use of executions. In fact, Texas has led the nation in executions since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. In 2025, Texas has already scheduled four executions, and the state continues to use lethal injection as its primary method of execution.
Despite the federal shift away from the death penalty, states like Texas remain committed to its use, creating a stark contrast in how justice is meted out across the country. This divide highlights the ongoing tension between federal and state policies on capital punishment and criminal justice reform.
Looking Ahead
As President Biden nears the end of his term, his decision to commute the sentences of 37 individuals facing death row is one of many moves that highlight his administration’s dedication to criminal justice reform. Whether or not these changes will have a lasting impact on the nation’s approach to the death penalty remains to be seen. However, it is clear that Biden’s actions have sparked important conversations about the future of capital punishment in the United States.
The commutations also reinforce the broader trend toward a more compassionate and rehabilitative approach to justice, one that prioritizes human dignity and second chances over retribution. As the country moves forward, the question of whether the death penalty should continue to have a place in the U.S. criminal justice system remains a topic of heated debate—but for now, the commutation of these 37 sentences represents a significant step in a new direction.
Login