Sen. Ron Johnson Opposes Pardon for Hunter Biden, Trump Weighs Commutation for Unity

Written by Published

Senator Ron Johnson, a Republican from Wisconsin, recently weighed in on the potential for a presidential pardon for Hunter Biden following his plea deal for federal tax charges in September. In an interview with NewsNation's Dan Abrams Live, Johnson made his position clear, saying he doesn't believe President-elect Trump should offer Hunter a pardon.

"I don't think he should pardon Hunter," Johnson stated firmly during the interview. "I think we need to be very careful about having a dual system of justice where the powerful, or the sons and daughters of the powerful get off scot-free."

This remark underscores Johnson's concern about the integrity of the justice system, particularly when it comes to powerful political figures and their families. Johnson, along with his colleague Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, has been one of the key players in leading investigations into allegations of corruption involving President Biden’s son, Hunter. They have made a point of criticizing the way the Biden administration's Justice Department has handled Hunter Biden’s legal troubles, suggesting that his cases were treated with more leniency than others would be in similar situations. Johnson’s vocal opposition to this "kid-gloves" treatment for Hunter contrasts with his ongoing criticisms of the criminal investigations targeting former President Donald Trump, which he frequently calls politically motivated.

While Johnson opposes the idea of a pardon, he did mention that Trump could consider commuting Hunter Biden's sentence as a way to show goodwill or attempt to unify the country. "I could see possibly commuting the sentence, reducing it, and it wouldn’t surprise me if President Trump would do that," Johnson said. However, he made it clear that he would not support an outright pardon for Hunter. "I would not pardon Hunter. I would certainly not," Johnson added, though he left open the possibility of a sentence reduction, stressing that he wouldn’t "scream about commuting his sentence or reducing it in some way, shape or form."

Hunter Biden’s legal issues have been making headlines ever since he was indicted on charges related to tax evasion. According to a December 2023 indictment, Hunter Biden was facing three felony counts and six misdemeanor charges for allegedly evading over $1.4 million in taxes. Prosecutors claim that, while Hunter was evading taxes, he was also spending lavishly on a range of personal luxuries, including drugs, escorts, luxury hotels, rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and much more. These expenditures, prosecutors argue, were “everything but his taxes.” The indictment further asserts that Hunter falsely classified many of his personal expenses as legitimate business deductions in order to reduce his taxable income. These included expenses for things like prostitutes, strip clubs, porn website subscriptions, and other personal indulgences.

The goal of this alleged scheme, according to the indictment, was clear: to "evade assessment of taxes to reduce the substantial tax liabilities" that Hunter Biden faced. This indictment paints a troubling picture of how Hunter Biden may have been attempting to game the system while living a life of luxury funded by both his high-profile connections and, allegedly, his illegal financial practices.

In response to questions about a potential pardon for Hunter, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has repeatedly stated that President Joe Biden has no intention of offering any such pardon. During a press briefing on Thursday, when asked again about the possibility, Jean-Pierre reaffirmed the administration’s position: "We’ve been asked that question multiple times. Our answer stands, which is no."

The idea of Hunter Biden receiving a pardon has been discussed in public by various political figures, including Donald Trump. In an October radio interview with Hugh Hewitt, Trump was asked whether he would consider pardoning Hunter Biden. His response was somewhat open-ended. "I wouldn't take it off the books," Trump said, acknowledging that while he had his own legal battles with the Biden administration, he could potentially extend a gesture of mercy towards Hunter. Trump went on to remark that despite Hunter’s legal issues, "Hunter’s a bad boy. There’s no question about it. He’s been a bad boy." He cited the infamous "laptop from hell" as evidence of Hunter’s questionable behavior.

Despite these criticisms, Trump indicated that pardoning or commuting Hunter Biden's sentence could be seen as an effort to promote national unity. "I happen to think it’s very bad for our country," he stated, suggesting that resolving the matter through a pardon or commutation might help heal some of the divisions in the country.

The discussion surrounding a possible pardon for Hunter Biden is layered with political tension, as the Biden family has long been a point of contention for Republicans, especially in the wake of numerous investigations and allegations against Hunter. The question of whether Hunter Biden will face consequences for his actions has become a focal point in the ongoing debate about accountability, fairness, and the potential influence of political connections in the legal system.

One of the more explosive aspects of the case has been the nature of the allegations against Hunter Biden. His legal troubles are part of a broader narrative involving high-level political figures and their families, which often stirs debate about the fairness of the justice system. The question of whether powerful figures or their relatives can avoid prosecution due to their connections is one of the more contentious issues facing the American political landscape. Many critics argue that the powerful too often escape justice, while ordinary citizens face far harsher penalties for similar crimes.

While the discussions about pardons and commutations are far from settled, it is clear that both the legal issues surrounding Hunter Biden and the political fallout from those issues will continue to shape American political discourse. The potential for pardons—whether for Hunter Biden or other figures caught up in legal disputes—brings to the forefront fundamental questions about the nature of justice, fairness, and the rule of law in America.

As of now, President Biden has made it clear through his spokesperson that he does not plan to pardon his son. Yet, the debates about pardons and the legal proceedings surrounding Hunter Biden continue to unfold in the public eye, with opinions divided across party lines. The discussions also serve as a reminder of the complex dynamics at play in the intersection of law, politics, and family ties.

With the legal system under scrutiny and the public divided on how justice should be served, the outcome of these investigations and the decisions surrounding Hunter Biden's fate may have far-reaching implications for both the Biden administration and the future of political accountability in the U.S. How these issues are handled could potentially shape not just public opinion about the justice system, but also the broader national conversation about fairness, power, and privilege.

At the same time, the political ramifications of any decisions made by President-elect Trump or President Biden will likely continue to fuel debates well into the future. These conversations are more than just about one individual or one family; they reflect the broader concerns many Americans have about the integrity of the system itself.