Swatting: A Dangerous Harassment Tactic Targeting High-Profile Figures, Including Trump’s Appointees

Written by Published

Swatting, a dangerously malicious form of harassment, has been an ongoing issue in the United States, with high-profile individuals becoming frequent victims. Recently, some of President-elect Donald Trump's appointees to key government roles were targeted by "swatting" incidents, prompting renewed attention to this dangerous trend. According to the FBI, several of Trump's selections received bomb threats and swatting calls in what appears to be an alarming wave of intimidation. Swatting, an insidious tactic, is challenging to stop, with perpetrators often going undetected, despite the harm and chaos it causes.

In a statement, Trump’s transition team confirmed that several of his appointees faced threats on Tuesday and Wednesday, though they did not disclose specific names or numbers of victims. Among the individuals targeted were those selected for high-ranking positions like Secretary of Labor and Secretary of Defense. At least six people who had been nominated for prominent government roles reported that their homes were swatted, which prompted swift law enforcement responses, putting both the victims and first responders at risk.

What Exactly Is Swatting?

Swatting is defined by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as the act of placing false emergency calls in order to cause a large-scale police response, often involving Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams, bomb squads, and other heavy law enforcement resources. The goal is to cause chaos and harm by making authorities believe that a serious threat—such as an active shooter, bomb threat, or hostage situation—is underway. Tragically, swatting has led to fatal consequences. In one notable incident, a man in Tennessee suffered a heart attack after being targeted by swatters, while another man was fatally shot by police during a swatting incident in Kansas.

Swatting is not just a random occurrence but a persistent problem that authorities in the U.S. have been trying to combat for over two decades. The practice has become increasingly common, particularly in incidents where hoax calls are made to schools, hospitals, governmental institutions, or even the homes of celebrities, journalists, and politicians. In fact, the DHS reports that swatting incidents often occur in clusters, and law enforcement agencies are regularly alerted about the growing threat.

While the exact number of swatting incidents each year is difficult to pinpoint, the FBI’s recent efforts to track and document such occurrences through a national database are a step forward. According to reports, hundreds of schools across the U.S. have been swatted in coordinated campaigns, primarily involving fake school shooting threats, which cause widespread panic among students, parents, and teachers.

The High-Profile Victims of Swatting

Swatting has impacted a broad range of individuals, from politicians to celebrities to everyday citizens. Some of the most well-known swatting incidents in recent years include attacks on the family home of gun control activist David Hogg, who survived the Parkland, Florida, shooting. Swatting also affected U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who presided over a high-profile case involving President Trump. Earlier this year, two European men were indicted for swatting multiple U.S. politicians and law enforcement officials, highlighting the international reach of this harmful practice.

In 2013, celebrity couple Kim Kardashian and Kanye West were targeted by swatters at their Los Angeles residence, an event that Kardashian later shared on social media. The same year, a 12-year-old boy from California was caught swatting other celebrities, including Justin Bieber and Ashton Kutcher. These high-profile cases demonstrate how swatting isn’t limited to any one type of individual but is a tactic that affects a variety of public figures.

A significant driver behind the rise of swatting incidents has been the gaming and streaming communities. Online gamers, particularly those on platforms like Twitch, have become frequent targets of swatters. Some streamers have even started sharing their terrifying experiences online, with video compilations of swatting incidents garnering attention. One such victim, Clara "Keffals" Sorrenti, a popular transgender Twitch streamer, publicly condemned the practice after experiencing it firsthand.

The Tragic Case of Tyler Barriss

One of the most infamous swatting incidents occurred in 2017 and ultimately led to the tragic death of an innocent man. Tyler Barriss, a 26-year-old man from California, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for falsely reporting a homicide that led to a police officer shooting and killing an uninvolved man in Kansas. The swatting incident started as a dispute between two gamers playing the popular game "Call of Duty: WWII." One of the players, after being threatened with a swatting incident, gave a random address to the other player, who then contacted Barriss, a notorious online swatter, to make the hoax call. Tragically, the police arrived at the address and shot an unsuspecting man who had nothing to do with the dispute. This incident brought national attention to the deadly consequences of swatting, sparking calls for stronger penalties for those involved in such hoaxes.

Why Is Swatting So Hard to Prevent?

Despite the severity of swatting and its life-threatening consequences, it remains a difficult crime to prevent and prosecute. One of the primary reasons for this is that swatters use sophisticated techniques to evade detection. Many perpetrators employ caller ID spoofing to make it appear as though they are calling from the victim's own phone number, complicating efforts to trace the origin of the call. Additionally, some use voice masking technology, which alters their voices to further disguise their identity.

Another tactic used by swatters is teletypewriter (TTY) relay, a phone system designed for people with hearing or speech impairments. This system can be manipulated by hoax callers to make it harder for authorities to track them down. Additionally, perpetrators sometimes use Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services to place calls over the internet, masking their location. This allows individuals located outside the U.S. to make false emergency calls that appear to originate within the country, further complicating investigations.

The anonymity of the internet and the ability to hide behind false identities have made swatting a favorite tool for online trolls and cyberbullies. And while law enforcement agencies have been trying to keep up with the surge in incidents, they are often hampered by technological loopholes and limited resources.

The Continued Threat of Swatting

The disturbing trend of swatting is showing no signs of slowing down. The FBI’s national database and other tracking initiatives are efforts to help identify and catch perpetrators, but swatting remains a persistent problem that threatens not only public safety but the mental and physical well-being of its victims. In recent weeks, swatting has resurfaced in connection with prominent figures from President-elect Trump’s team, indicating that this tactic of harassment remains a serious concern for those in the public eye.

For those targeted by swatting, the emotional toll can be immense. Victims of swatting incidents often report feelings of fear, anxiety, and distress, knowing that law enforcement may arrive at their homes unexpectedly, potentially putting themselves and their families at risk. The unpredictability of a swatting incident makes it especially dangerous.

To combat this ongoing threat, it's critical for authorities to work together, using the latest technology and legal frameworks to deter this kind of harassment. But as long as the perpetrators can remain hidden behind the anonymity of the internet, swatting will continue to be a dangerous and unpredictable challenge for law enforcement and the public alike.