Don’t Count on Texas Passing Another Total THC Ban Anytime Soon—Even If Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick Says Otherwise
If you’re betting on the Texas Legislature to slam the door shut on THC products with another outright ban, you might want to reconsider. Despite the tough talk from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick—the man who pretty much controls the state Senate—things aren’t as straightforward as they seem.
The Power Player: Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick
Patrick is no stranger to wielding power in Texas politics. He’s one of the most influential figures in the Republican Party down there, commanding respect (and sometimes fear) in equal measure. When it comes to pushing through bills, he’s a legislative heavyweight—especially when it comes to controversial issues like THC regulations.
But here’s the catch: Patrick’s power isn’t limitless. The upcoming special session starting July 21 puts him in a tougher spot than usual.
Why Special Sessions Change the Game
Special sessions in Texas aren’t your typical legislative marathons. Unlike regular sessions, which cover a wide range of topics, special sessions come with a laser-focused agenda. The governor decides what lawmakers can even discuss. This means Patrick has fewer cards to play when it comes to bargaining or pushing through legislation.
During the regular session that wrapped up on June 2, the House was actually leaning toward lighter THC regulations. Patrick, however, flexed his muscles and got a total ban passed through the Senate. That was no small feat, but it also left some lawmakers frustrated, especially those who think a ban is too extreme.
Then, the plot thickened.
Gov. Greg Abbott’s Veto Throws a Wrench in Patrick’s Plans
Last week, Governor Greg Abbott vetoed Senate Bill 3—the total THC ban bill Patrick championed. Abbott’s reasoning? He wants regulations that make more sense, not a one-size-fits-all ban. This veto essentially pulls the rug out from under Patrick’s straightforward ban approach.
So even though Patrick said he’d push again for a total ban in the special session, this time he can’t use the usual heavy-handed tactics to strong-arm the House. That means negotiations will be trickier, more drawn out, and maybe more realistic.
Opening the Door for Alternative Approaches
With Abbott’s veto and the limitations of a special session, there’s more room for lawmakers to explore regulation options that are less extreme than Patrick’s total ban. Some suggest treating THC products more like tobacco or alcohol—industries with strict rules but not outright bans.
This middle ground approach has gained traction, even among Republicans. Take conservative talk radio host Chad Hasty, for example—he pushed back against Patrick’s ban on the popular Texas Take Podcast, reflecting a faction within the GOP that favors regulation over prohibition.
The Battle Over THC Isn’t Just Political, It’s Cultural
The Texas THC debate is more than just legislative maneuvering. It’s about how the state’s identity and values shape policies around cannabis-related products. Patrick himself, a former Houston talk radio host, understands this dynamic well—he knows how to sway public opinion, especially among conservatives.
“Patrick is a skilled legislative knife fighter who also understands how to move public opinion, especially among Republicans,” says Brandon Rottinghaus, a political science professor at the University of Houston.
That means Patrick’s not powerless. Far from it.
Still in Control—but Facing New Challenges
Patrick still controls the Senate, and nothing passes there without his nod. He can block bills, push his agenda, and rally support where needed. But the special session’s structure gives Governor Abbott an edge.
In special sessions, the governor’s power rises. Abbott gets to handpick what the legislature can debate, limiting them to only those issues he prioritizes. Plus, he keeps his veto pen ready, which can shut down any bill he dislikes.
Rottinghaus sums it up well:
“It’s the best jab-cross combination any politician has to push legislation.”
That’s a knockout punch from Abbott that Patrick must carefully navigate.
Why This Matters to Texans
Here’s the big picture: Texans have a real stake in how THC is regulated. This isn’t just about politics in Austin—it affects businesses, consumers, law enforcement, and public health.
-
Businesses want clear, workable rules to operate.
-
Consumers want safe, legal access to products they choose.
-
Law enforcement wants clarity to enforce laws fairly.
-
Public health advocates want to ensure safety and reduce abuse.
The all-or-nothing approach Patrick pushed leaves many feeling uneasy. A ban might drive the market underground or lead to legal confusion. On the flip side, looser regulations without safeguards could bring other issues.
That’s why the compromise route—regulating THC more like alcohol or tobacco—could be the best way forward, balancing freedom and responsibility.
What to Expect in the July 21 Special Session
Here’s a quick rundown of what might go down:
-
Patrick pushes for a full ban, banking on his Senate control.
-
Abbott insists on tailored regulations, likely vetoing anything too broad.
-
House members push for moderate rules that protect businesses and consumers without banning products outright.
-
Conservative voices split, some backing Patrick’s tough stance, others favoring measured regulations.
-
Public pressure mounts as Texans watch lawmakers debate.
It’s a classic Texas political showdown with high stakes and plenty of drama.
Key Takeaways
-
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick is powerful but faces limits in the upcoming special session.
-
Gov. Greg Abbott’s veto signals a preference for smart regulation over total bans.
-
The special session’s limited agenda shifts leverage to the governor.
-
Moderate THC regulations like those for alcohol or tobacco are gaining support.
-
Patrick’s legislative savvy still makes him a formidable player.
-
Texans will see a heated debate balancing politics, culture, and practical concerns.
Final Thoughts
So, if you hear Dan Patrick talking tough about banning THC again, remember: it’s not a done deal. The special session’s unique setup, Abbott’s veto, and the growing appetite for balanced regulation mean the Texas THC conversation is far from over—and probably heading into more nuanced territory.
The story is still unfolding, but one thing’s clear: Texas politics, especially on hot-button issues like THC, never lacks for excitement.
Login