Tragedy in Minneapolis: School Shooting, Trey Gowdy’s Remarks, and the National Outcry

Written by Published

A Nation Shaken: Tragedy, Faith, and Outrage After Minneapolis School Shooting

It’s the kind of headline that makes your heart drop instantly—a school shooting inside a Minneapolis Catholic church during a weekday morning mass. What should have been a peaceful moment of prayer turned into an unthinkable nightmare when a gunman opened fire through the church windows. Children were kneeling, praying, doing what every parent believes is the safest and purest thing their child could be doing. And then, in the middle of it all, violence shattered that sense of safety.

Two young lives—just 8 and 10 years old—were cut short. Seventeen more people were hurt, including fourteen children, some of them critically. And yet again, America is left asking the same heartbreaking questions: Why does this keep happening? When will it stop? And how do we even begin to heal?


The Suspect and the Chaos

Authorities identified the shooter as Robin Westman, previously known as Robert, who had legally changed their name after identifying as female. Police ultimately referred to the suspect as “he.” According to officials, Westman came armed with multiple weapons—a rifle, a shotgun, and a pistol.

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara described the chilling details. He noted that the shooter approached one side of the church and had deliberately blocked several doors with a two-by-four, almost as if trapping the victims inside. “Not all doors were blocked,” O’Hara clarified, “but on the side where the shooting occurred, at least two doors had been secured.”

The chaos ended only when the shooter died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. But by then, the damage was already done—two families destroyed, and a community traumatized.


Trey Gowdy Weighs In

On Fox News’ mid-day show Outnumbered, former prosecutor and congressman Trey Gowdy was asked to share his perspective. With his background as a lawmaker and former assistant U.S. attorney, his words carried weight. But what he said quickly became the center of controversy.

He started by pointing out the vulnerability of churches and schools, calling them “the softest of all targets.” In his words, “The church literally rolls out the welcome mat for troubled people. It’s supposed to be a safe place for the broken, the depressed, and the ostracized.” And he wasn’t wrong—churches are built on the idea of open doors. But as Gowdy reminded viewers, that same openness can make them tragically easy targets.

Then he shifted to the victims: the children. “Even those who survived,” he said, “will carry scars for the rest of their lives. And for the parents who lost their babies—there are simply no words.”


His Most Controversial Comment

But it wasn’t Gowdy’s acknowledgment of grief that made headlines—it was his attempt to comfort. Looking into the camera, Gowdy said:

“The only thing that can give us any modicum of peace at all is that those two children are with the person who loved them the very most—the person who created them—that being Jesus. That is the only thing that can possibly give parents any peace.”

To many religious Americans, these words may have felt genuine, maybe even comforting. But to others—especially grieving parents who aren’t ready to hear any spiritual platitudes—it struck a very different nerve.


Backlash From the Left

The internet erupted almost immediately. Progressives and liberals accused Gowdy of being tone-deaf, even cruel.

  • Rolling Stone journalist Asawin Suebsang wrote that while people of faith often find solace in religion, it was the wrong thing to say on national television, especially so soon after the tragedy. “I know a ton of people who are serious about their faith,” Suebsang posted. “But I would never think to tell a grieving parent that their murdered child is ‘with Jesus’ in that moment.”

  • Former Jezebel editor-in-chief Laura Bassett didn’t mince words either. Her reaction was blunt: “What the F**. If a man said that to me after my child was murdered with a gun, I’d strangle him on the spot.”*

To many critics, it wasn’t about theology—it was about timing, empathy, and the inability to read the room in a moment of raw national grief.


Surprisingly, Conservatives Joined In

Ironically, Gowdy also found himself under fire from the right wing—but for a completely different reason. A little later in the same broadcast, he made a comment about mass shooters that infuriated many conservative viewers.

“We’re going to have to talk about freedom versus protecting children,” Gowdy said. “How many school shootings will it take before we finally have a conversation about keeping firearms out of—well, it’s almost always young white males. Almost always. Did anyone today think it might be a woman? Did anyone?”

That observation, although backed by statistics, was enough to spark outrage among conservative circles online. Some right-wing commentators on X (formerly Twitter) even demanded that Fox News “fire him now” and accused him of betraying conservative values.


The Bigger Conversation: Guns, Safety, and Faith

Every school shooting in America brings back the same debates—and this tragedy is no different. Gowdy himself hinted at it: freedom versus safety. How do we balance the right to bear arms with the need to keep children safe in schools and churches?

These places are meant to be sanctuaries—whether it’s a classroom filled with learning or a church filled with prayer. Instead, they’ve become battlefields in an ongoing crisis. Parents are dropping their kids off at school and wondering if they’ll see them again. Worshippers are entering their sanctuaries with the uneasy thought that the next service could be their last.

And each time it happens, the conversations around mental health, gun access, and security resurface—but with little progress.


Faith as Comfort—or Fuel for Debate?

Gowdy’s comments about the children being with Jesus touched on a sensitive reality: in moments like this, people search for comfort anywhere they can find it. For many, that means leaning on faith. For others, faith-based platitudes can feel dismissive or hollow.

Maybe the truth is that both perspectives can be valid. Some grieving families will find solace in believing their children are with God. Others will find that notion unbearable in the early stages of grief. Both are real human reactions—and neither should be dismissed.


Where Do We Go From Here?

At the end of the day, the outrage over Gowdy’s words is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. What really matters is the community in Minneapolis that is now left shattered. Families are grieving, children are recovering from injuries, and a church that once symbolized hope and sanctuary is now marked by violence.

This isn’t just about what Trey Gowdy said on Fox News. It’s about how America continues to wrestle with the cycle of mass shootings.

  • Parents want safety for their kids.

  • Communities want their sanctuaries back.

  • The nation wants answers.

And yet, the same story keeps repeating—school shootings, thoughts and prayers, outrage, then silence… until the next tragedy.


Final Thoughts

Trey Gowdy’s remarks may have hit a raw nerve, but they also forced the same uncomfortable conversation America keeps putting off: What are we willing to do to protect children in schools and churches?

Maybe the real takeaway isn’t whether his words were right or wrong—but that they were said at all, and that we still don’t have answers.

Because until something changes, we’ll keep waking up to more stories like this one. And that, perhaps, is the most unbearable truth of all.