This week, a pivotal moment is approaching for former President Donald Trump as a New York judge decides whether his criminal conviction related to hush money payments should be overturned. The case revolves around the payments made to a porn star and whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in July on presidential immunity affects the outcome. Justice Juan Merchan has promised to make a decision by Tuesday, marking the first of two major decisions he must make following Trump’s election victory on November 5.
This case is critical in shaping the future of Trump’s legal troubles, as the judge must also determine if Trump will be sentenced on November 26 as scheduled. However, experts believe that it’s unlikely the sentencing will take place before Trump’s January 20 inauguration.
If Judge Merchan rules in Trump’s favor on the immunity issue or delays the sentencing, it could clear the path for Trump to return to the White House without the weight of the criminal cases hanging over him. These cases were once seen as significant obstacles to his ambitions, but a favorable ruling could leave him largely free to focus on his political comeback.
On the other hand, the U.S. Department of Justice is currently reviewing how to wrap up two federal criminal cases brought against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. These cases are tied to Trump’s actions following the 2020 election and his role in attempting to overturn the results. The Justice Department is bound by its longstanding policy of not prosecuting a sitting president, so any legal actions regarding Trump’s federal charges may have to wait until he is out of office.
Meanwhile, a separate state case in Georgia, concerning Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, remains in a state of uncertainty. As of now, Trump, who is 78 years old, has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing in all four cases. He has consistently framed the charges against him as politically motivated attacks from allies of President Joe Biden, aimed at derailing his campaign for a return to the presidency. Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, emphasized this point, claiming that the American people want an end to what he called the "weaponization of our justice system."
In May, Trump became the first U.S. president to be convicted of a crime. A Manhattan jury found him guilty of falsifying business records in an effort to cover up a potential sex scandal from the time leading up to his first presidential victory in 2016. Despite the conviction, Trump has vowed to appeal after sentencing, hoping for a reversal of the decision.
Trump’s legal team argues that the conviction should be dismissed in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity. The ruling, which came out of one of Smith’s two cases against Trump, established that presidents are immune from prosecution for actions related to their official duties. The ruling also indicated that evidence of official acts, such as the president's social media posts and conversations with aides in the White House, should not be considered in cases involving personal conduct. It marked the first time the Supreme Court acknowledged any form of presidential immunity from prosecution.
Trump’s defense lawyers contend that the jury was improperly presented with evidence of his actions while serving as president, including his social media posts and testimony about conversations that occurred during his time in office from 2017 to 2021. They argue that the case must be dismissed because of this evidence.
However, prosecutors from the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, have argued that the Supreme Court ruling does not apply to this case. They maintain that the conduct in question was entirely unofficial, with no connection to Trump’s presidential duties. Legal experts point out that the Supreme Court’s ruling did not extend immunity to a president’s unofficial actions, which is the basis of the Manhattan case.
New York Law School professor Anna Cominsky noted that even if Judge Merchan finds that some of the evidence presented during the trial should not have been included, it is unlikely to change the outcome of the jury’s decision. In this case, the court would likely not dismiss the conviction on these grounds.
Even if the conviction stands, legal experts predict that Trump’s defense team will likely request a delay in sentencing. Trump is facing a potential sentence of up to four years in prison after being convicted on 34 felony counts related to the hush money payments. However, experts believe that while a prison sentence is possible, it is more likely that Trump would face lesser penalties, such as fines or probation, given his circumstances and the nature of the charges.
The stakes in this case are incredibly high, not just for Trump but for the broader political landscape. A ruling in Trump’s favor could dramatically shift the narrative surrounding his legal battles, allowing him to maintain his political momentum as he heads into the 2024 presidential race. A delay in sentencing or the dismissal of the case would help solidify his position, unencumbered by legal challenges, as he works toward another bid for the White House.
In contrast, a decision against Trump could provide more fuel for his critics, intensifying the narrative that his actions have legal consequences that cannot be ignored, even for a former president. The intersection of law and politics in this case is impossible to ignore, as every legal development could have far-reaching implications for both Trump’s political career and the integrity of the judicial system.
As the country watches these legal proceedings unfold, one thing is clear: the outcome will shape the future of Trump’s political aspirations and could have significant consequences for how presidential immunity is understood and applied in future legal cases. Whether or not Trump can shake off these legal challenges and return to the White House remains uncertain, but the legal and political drama surrounding his cases is sure to keep the nation on edge for months to come.
As we await Justice Merchan’s decision, there’s no doubt that the intersection of law, politics, and presidential power will continue to captivate the American public, drawing attention from all corners of the nation. Whether the case results in a victory for Trump or a significant setback, the eyes of the nation will remain fixed on this high-stakes moment in American history.
Login