President-elect Donald Trump is crafting his second-term cabinet and White House staff with a strategic focus on loyalty, aiming to fill top positions with individuals who are fully aligned with his agenda. His approach includes tapping deep congressional experience, especially from those who back his hardline positions on immigration and foreign policy, while largely bypassing establishment Republicans—whom Trump blames for hindering his first-term objectives.
One of the most notable appointments so far is Rep. Mike Waltz (R-Fla.), a former Army Green Beret, who shares Trump’s tough stance on illegal immigration and skepticism about continued U.S. support for Ukraine. Waltz is being considered for the pivotal role of National Security Adviser, a position Trump has elevated to cabinet rank, though it won’t require Senate confirmation. This move reflects Trump’s clear preference for loyalists who will support his “America First” agenda without hesitation.
In another exciting development, Trump is reportedly eyeing Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) for the position of Secretary of State. While Rubio has historically differed with Trump on issues like the importance of alliances and policies regarding China and Iran, he has also echoed Trump’s calls to end the war in Ukraine. This shift in alignment underscores Trump’s strategy of bringing in those who might have previously criticized him but whose views are now increasingly aligned with his own. Rubio’s appointment would mark a significant evolution in their political relationship, especially considering their contentious rivalry during the 2016 presidential race, where Trump famously dubbed him “Little Marco.”
Although Trump has not yet made clear his choices for Secretary of Defense or Treasury, rumors swirl about potential candidates. Among them are hedge fund manager Scott Bessent and billionaire investor John Paulson, both of whom supported Trump during the campaign. These names indicate Trump’s continued reliance on individuals who bring a strong business background and have been publicly supportive of his presidency.
The challenge, however, remains in achieving the level of unity Trump desires within his administration. To ensure Senate confirmations, Trump may be forced to select some candidates whose views differ from his own in key areas. This tension is a recurring theme from his first term, where disagreements between his team members and agencies were common, and it’s a dynamic that could easily play out again in his second term.
Among the other noteworthy appointments, Trump has announced that Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), his first high-profile supporter in his re-election bid, will be nominated as the next U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Alongside her, Trump has chosen Stephen Miller, a staunch immigration hard-liner, to serve as Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy. Miller’s appointment signals that Trump’s focus on immigration and border security will remain central in his administration.
Trump’s team also includes Tom Homan, a fierce advocate of family separation at the border, who is set to become the new "border czar," and former Republican lawmaker Lee Zeldin, who has been nominated to lead the Environmental Protection Agency. Trump’s choice of South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to head the Department of Homeland Security further illustrates his dedication to tightening border policies, as Noem, a long-time Trump ally, is expected to play a crucial role in implementing his stringent immigration reforms.
In a move to send a strong message about the discipline he intends to instill in his second term, Trump has selected Susie Wiles as White House Chief of Staff. Wiles, known for her candid advice and low-profile demeanor, has earned praise from Trump for the discipline she brought to his campaign. Her ability to maintain order without seeking the spotlight could help Trump avoid the infighting that plagued his first term, as insiders close to the president-elect suggest that Wiles will be crucial in running a more cohesive operation this time around.
Trump’s preference for loyalty in senior appointments is crystal clear. “What Trump will look for in senior nominees in a second term is fealty. He wants ‘yes men’ and ‘yes women,’” said John Bolton, who served as Trump’s National Security Adviser during his first term. Bolton, now one of Trump’s outspoken critics, has also pointed out that the president’s desire for unwavering loyalty could hinder a diversity of ideas, which might lead to missed opportunities for growth or effective policy development.
One of the more contentious exclusions in Trump’s cabinet plans is former CIA Director and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Despite Pompeo’s long tenure with the administration, Trump has rejected him due to Pompeo’s continued support for U.S. assistance to Ukraine. Similarly, Trump has distanced himself from Nikki Haley, his former U.N. ambassador and current rival, who broke with him over NATO support. Trump’s response to their departures was relatively gracious, acknowledging their service to the country, but the split highlights the president’s deep desire to surround himself with like-minded advisers who share his worldview.
The notion of loyalty among Trump’s inner circle is further reinforced by Donald Trump Jr.’s efforts to keep other candidates who don’t fully align with his father’s agenda out of the administration. “I’m working on keeping people who aren’t aligned with my father’s views out of the administration,” he posted on social media, signaling that the Trump family is deeply involved in shaping the next iteration of the White House.
For those who have served in Trump’s inner circle, such as Robert O’Brien, his fourth National Security Adviser, the prospect of returning to government service is still up in the air. O’Brien, who expressed enthusiasm about the president’s selection of his next cabinet, also acknowledged that he may remain in the private sector, watching from the sidelines while cheering on Trump’s agenda.
A key takeaway from this cabinet-making process is the emphasis on loyalty as a guiding principle. With more like-minded individuals at the helm, Trump aims to pursue his “America First” agenda with fewer internal obstacles. However, critics warn that this tight-knit approach could backfire, fostering groupthink and stifling healthy dissent. “Trump looks set on bringing in a team that prizes loyalty, which could instill some message discipline but also risks groupthink,” said Richard Fontaine of the Center for a New American Security, underscoring the risks of relying too heavily on echo chambers.
Trump’s decision-making style, which often includes announcements made on social media or without prior consultation with advisers, has raised concerns about the efficacy of such an approach in his second term. During his first term, aides frequently had to walk back decisions that were hastily made, and with a more loyalist-driven staff, these moves may be carried out without much debate or opposition, leaving little room for alternative viewpoints or considerations.
The overarching theme of Trump’s second-term strategy is clear: he wants to pursue his bold, non-traditional policies with fewer roadblocks from within his administration. Whether it’s withdrawing from foreign conflicts, raising tariffs, or pressuring allies to pay more for their own defense, Trump is setting up a team that aligns closely with his vision. Yet, the question remains: will this approach lead to smooth governance, or will the lack of diverse perspectives ultimately undermine the effectiveness of his policies?
Trump’s former Pentagon appointees, including generals placed in top positions at the beginning of his first term, often proved to be barriers to his most ambitious goals, such as withdrawing U.S. forces from Afghanistan. It wasn’t until 2020 that a deal was struck with the Taliban for troop withdrawal, and even then, it came with delays and pushback from the military establishment. As Trump prepares for his second term, the challenge will be balancing his desire for loyalty with the practical realities of governing a nation as complex as the U.S., where dissenting views and debates are often a necessary part of decision-making.
Through this cabinet overhaul, Trump aims to streamline the decision-making process and ensure that his second term is less hindered by internal divisions. But only time will tell if his reliance on loyalists will empower him to move his agenda forward or if it will result in missed opportunities for better policy outcomes.
Login