The former president's defense team, gearing up for Donald Trump's New York hush money trial, is pushing back against a proposed gag order. They argue Trump should be allowed to fully respond to attacks from political opponents. The defense called the proposed gag order "unconstitutional" and emphasized the importance of Trump's First Amendment right to address all issues related to the case.
On the other side, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has requested limitations on Trump's public comments, especially concerning potential witnesses, jurors, and judicial staff. Prosecutors raised concerns about Trump's history of inflammatory remarks and the potential for these comments to disrupt the trial and prejudice the proceedings.
In response, Trump's lawyers highlighted his compliance with past gag orders and protective measures. They also criticized the proposed gag order as a "heckler's veto," arguing that it fails to specify which third parties might engage in threats or harassment.
Trump's legal team further argued that Trump's comments are protected speech, especially given his ongoing presidential campaign. They asserted that Trump should be able to criticize public figures involved in the case, including recent comments made by Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen.
With jury selection set to begin soon, the debate over a gag order adds another layer of complexity to Trump's legal challenges. As the trial date approaches, the courtroom drama is sure to intensify, with both sides vigorously defending their positions.
Login