In a tell-all discussion during his weekly appearance on "The Spiegel & Holmes Show" on 670 The Score, Johnson voiced his frustrations with the frantic final moments of the game. Unreservedly, he reflected on how the Bears could have slowed down, possibly taken a timeout, and organized a more deliberate plan for that crucial play. "It was a rushed situation when it didn’t have to be," Johnson expressed to host Chris Emma. “I feel like we definitely could’ve slowed down. Just looking at it, I feel like we could’ve possibly taken a timeout or something to get everybody situated, figure out who we were going to box out, kind of get everybody calmed down and ready for that last play.” Johnson’s commentary didn’t simply emphasize his disappointment but pointed to a breakdown in sideline leadership that might have contributed to the Bears’ downfall.
The frustration Johnson and his teammates voiced has stirred speculation about potential tensions in the Bears’ locker room, with team members openly questioning the decisions of their head coach—a rare and often cautionary occurrence in NFL culture. With Johnson and others going public, the stage seems set for some tough internal conversations. Eberflus’s apparent dismissal of the sideline play’s impact on the final outcome, labeling the Hail Mary execution as the main issue, hasn’t sat well with players who believe the lead-up play could have shifted the game’s momentum. Now, team leaders are left to wrestle with a situation where players and the head coach appear divided on a fundamental level.
Key Concerns Raised by the Players
- The Hail Mary Breakdown: According to Johnson, the team might have been better prepared with a simple timeout. Johnson stressed that the players weren’t given enough time to align their roles and responsibilities on that critical play. By the time they took the field, they were improvising instead of executing a structured plan.
- Accountability and Responsibility: For many Bears players, including veteran leaders, the game-ending play wasn’t about individual mistakes but about collective responsibility—players felt the hurried pace disrupted their ability to perform at their peak.
- Leadership and Strategic Adjustments: The clash between the head coach's assessment and the players’ experience could signal a larger disconnect. Eberflus insists that execution, rather than play-calling, caused the Hail Mary breakdown. Players, however, disagree, suggesting there were missed opportunities to organize better, hinting at a gap in sideline leadership.
Johnson’s concerns aren’t new; he has spoken out about coaching calls before, notably last season following the Bears' final regular-season game against the Green Bay Packers. Although those moments didn't involve dramatic game-ending losses, his outspokenness hints that his frustrations have been brewing for a while, and this recent game against Washington only intensified them. For a veteran like Johnson, who is also a team captain, his words carry substantial weight, making his critiques impossible to ignore.
The Fallout and What’s Next
As the Bears gear up for their upcoming game against the Arizona Cardinals, they face mounting pressure to regroup and address these communication lapses. The coaching staff leans heavily on the leadership council, a select group of players whose voices influence team morale and dynamics. Now that frustration has spilled into the media, the pressure is squarely on Eberflus and his coaching team to not only improve their in-game tactics but also reassure the players that they’re being heard. This week’s team meetings are bound to be intense as players and coaches confront these challenges head-on.
As for Eberflus, he doubled down on his stance in his post-game comments, focusing on the idea that the play’s failure was purely about on-field execution. Yet, the sideline actions leading up to that final Hail Mary pass seem to suggest otherwise. Players like Johnson believe the rushed sequence before the Hail Mary compounded the confusion on the field and undermined their ability to prevent the unexpected touchdown. If miscommunication in high-pressure moments continues, it could further impact team unity—and potentially future games.
What This Means for Bears Fans and the Season Ahead
For Bears fans, this episode presents a pivotal moment in the season. Is the team at a crossroads where frustration might lead to positive change, or will tensions continue to boil under the surface? For Johnson and others, the frustration isn’t just about one lost game but a shared sense that the team can achieve more with a tighter, more cohesive approach to critical situations. Bears fans and analysts alike are eager to see how Eberflus will respond and if his leadership can realign the Bears’ trajectory.
On one hand, this open dialogue within the team could lead to improvements in play-calling, better communication, and a renewed sense of accountability. On the other, if unresolved, these issues could deepen rifts within the team, complicating their path forward. Fans can only hope that these tough conversations lead to meaningful changes on the field.
As the Bears look to move past this difficult loss, a few things are clear: accountability, preparation, and leadership will be crucial if they’re to turn the tide.
Login