When the Selection Committee Dropped the Ball: Lessons from the College Football Playoff Debacle
College football is a sport rich in passion, tradition, and nail-biting moments. But every so often, a decision comes along that leaves fans, players, and coaches scratching their heads. This year’s College Football Playoff delivered just that—a head-scratcher of epic proportions. While the game is about learning and evolving, this postseason will forever be remembered as an uncharted misstep, punctuated by one glaring question: How in the world did Indiana make it into the playoffs?
Indiana's Bumpy Road to the Playoff Spotlight
Before diving into the aftermath, let’s retrace how Indiana even ended up under the postseason spotlight. The selection committee, in an unusually generous move, had Indiana ranked ninth in the nation early on—despite the team’s lackluster schedule. A slate filled with bottom-tier Big Ten teams and non-conference opponents like Florida International, Western Illinois, and Charlotte hardly screamed "playoff caliber." Two of those teams fired their coaches by season’s end, underlining just how unimpressive Indiana’s competition was. Yet, somehow, the committee saw a contender.
The Hoosiers’ season boiled down to a three-game stretch: struggling Michigan, powerhouse Ohio State, and a dismal Purdue squad. While Indiana managed to beat Michigan and Purdue, their single game of real significance—a matchup against Ohio State—exposed their limitations. They lost by 23 points, scoring just 15 against a defense that wasn’t even Big Ten championship-worthy. In one staggering stretch during the Ohio State game, Indiana’s offense ran 30 plays for a mere eight yards. Yes, eight.
And yet, here we were, watching Indiana take the field in the College Football Playoff.
Notre Dame vs. Indiana: A Reality Check
The quarterfinal matchup between Notre Dame and Indiana was less of a contest and more of a formality. Notre Dame, led by head coach Marcus Freeman, dismantled the Hoosiers 27-17, though the score hardly tells the full story. By the time Indiana scored two garbage-time touchdowns in the final 90 seconds, Notre Dame had already packed up their figurative bags and started looking ahead to Georgia in the Sugar Bowl semifinal.
"This team earned the right to be here," Indiana coach Curt Cignetti proclaimed after the game, though even he must have known how hollow those words sounded. Notre Dame's Jeremiyah Love set a playoff record with a breathtaking 98-yard touchdown run, torching Indiana’s supposedly impenetrable No. 1 rush defense. It was the kind of play that highlighted the absurdity of Indiana’s inclusion in the postseason.
For a sputtering Notre Dame offense that often settled for field goals, the game could’ve been a much bigger blowout. As Freeman admitted afterward, the late-game lapse by his defense was a chance to “humble ourselves” before the much tougher test against SEC champion Georgia.
A Selection Committee Misstep for the Ages
The selection committee has made controversial choices before—Ohio State over Penn State in 2016, Notre Dame over Texas A&M in 2020—but none have been as egregious as this. Indiana’s inclusion wasn’t just a bad call; it was recklessly negligent. Teams like Alabama, Miami, South Carolina, and Ole Miss, all more deserving, were left watching from home while Indiana stumbled onto the national stage.
At what point, one wonders, did the 13-member committee realize their mistake? Was it during Indiana’s first three-and-out? Or maybe after the Hoosiers’ seventh scoreless drive, which ended in either a punt or a turnover? By the time Love’s record-breaking touchdown happened, the error was glaringly obvious to everyone except, it seemed, the committee itself.
The Broader Implications for the Playoff System
This debacle isn’t just about one team’s undeserved playoff berth; it’s a symptom of deeper issues within the selection process. The current system places undue emphasis on win totals without adequately considering the quality of those wins. Sure, Indiana went 11-1, but a closer look at their schedule reveals just how hollow that record was.
Officials from the SEC and Big Ten have already hinted at reevaluating the entire playoff process. Discussions are underway to examine everything—from the format to campus games to the metrics used by the committee. Some are even questioning the necessity of having a committee at all. Oklahoma athletic director Joe Castiglione captured the sentiment best: "It’s one season, so I don’t like to be a prisoner of the moment. But I think it’s incumbent upon us to always assess everything."
What’s Next for the Playoff System?
As the sport gears up for a new media rights deal in 2026, changes to the playoff format are inevitable. The current system has its merits, but it’s clear that lessons need to be learned from this year’s misstep. The inclusion of Indiana—an anomaly that left fans baffled and teams feeling cheated—cannot happen again.
And it’s not just about avoiding another Indiana-like situation. It’s about preserving the integrity of a postseason that represents the pinnacle of college football. The committee, as the keepers of this magnificent sport, must spend the offseason addressing these flaws to ensure that future playoffs truly feature the best teams.
The Final Word
For Indiana, this season was undoubtedly a historic achievement, regardless of how it ended. The players and coaches did everything asked of them, taking care of business against the teams on their schedule. But as this postseason has shown, simply winning games isn’t enough to justify a spot in the playoffs. The bar needs to be higher.
The hope now is that this debacle serves as a turning point for college football. A moment where the sport’s leaders take a hard look at the system and make the necessary changes. Because the last thing anyone wants is another postseason marred by controversy and confusion.
Let’s face it: college football deserves better. Fans deserve better. And most importantly, the players who pour their hearts into this game deserve better. So, here’s to learning from mistakes and making sure that 2026—and every year after—is a celebration of the very best the sport has to offer.
Login