Rethinking the NFL Passer Rating: Is It Time for an Update?
Just ten days ago, I dove into a topic that’s been a hot button for fans and analysts alike—the NFL passer rating system. This system, which has been around since 1973, is starting to show its age and, frankly, its unfairness. It simply doesn’t account for how the game has evolved or the advancements in technology that have come along since then. Let’s break this down and explore why this outdated formula deserves a fresh look.
When the passer rating formula was first crafted, it was based on what was known about the game at that time. The formula set average percentages for various categories, but here’s the kicker: the average completion percentage was pegged at a mere 50.0%. Fast forward to 2023, and the league’s average completion percentage has skyrocketed to 64.5%. That’s a significant leap! You can’t just stick with old metrics when the game itself is evolving at such a rapid pace.
Back in the day, the league relied on a booklet to manually calculate passer ratings. It’s hard to believe, but the system wasn’t even intended for game use! Official game statistics didn’t include passer ratings until 1997. So, we’re talking about a system that was born from a different era—one where the players, the style of play, and the technology were all drastically different.
In a recent discussion, I focused on quarterbacks who have hit that elusive 158.3 passer rating mark during games. While it’s exciting to celebrate these achievements, I felt that the conversation overlooked a crucial aspect: there are plenty of instances where quarterbacks had performances that deserved higher ratings but didn’t get the credit they deserved.
To achieve that perfect passer rating of 158.3, a quarterback needs to excel in three key areas: completion percentage (77.5), average yards per attempt (12.5), and touchdown percentage (11.9). However, it’s entirely possible for a quarterback to surpass the maximum in one of these categories but fall short in others, resulting in a lower official rating. This begs the question: how many great performances are going unrecognized?
Here’s the exciting part: there are over 300 instances where a quarterback would’ve hit or surpassed the 158.3 rating if the system were more flexible and accommodating. And you can bet there are many more that fall short of this mark for the same reason. So, what gives?
Let’s take a look at Washington Commanders quarterback Jayden Daniels, who’s gearing up to face the Arizona Cardinals at State Farm Stadium this Sunday. In a thrilling Monday night game against the Cincinnati Bengals, Daniels notched an impressive “official” passer rating of 141.7. But here’s the jaw-dropper: he set an all-time rookie record by completing a staggering 91.3% of his passes during that game. Yet, this remarkable achievement gets zero acknowledgment in the passer rating formula, which has a cap of 77.5% for completion percentage.
How does that make any sense? It simply doesn’t.
Now, if we look at Daniels’ performance through a different lens—specifically, the Balzer Adjusted Passer Rating (BAPR)—we see a different story. That incredible 91.3% completion rate may not push him past the coveted 158.3 threshold, but it does boost his BAPR to 153.1.
As the iconic detective Joe Friday from the classic TV series Dragnet famously stated, “All we want are the facts.” And when it comes to football stats, the facts can’t be ignored. Anyone can try to justify the current passer rating system, but it becomes increasingly difficult when we look at the performance data.
The Need for a Modern System
Given the sheer number of quarterbacks who exceed those maximum figures in various categories, isn’t it time to rethink how we calculate passer ratings? The current system feels like a relic, one that fails to account for the complexities and advancements in today’s game.
For starters, we should consider a more nuanced approach to evaluating quarterback performance. Football is a team sport, and many factors influence a quarterback's success in a game. Why not integrate additional metrics that reflect the changing dynamics of the game? For example, we could incorporate factors like the quality of the opposing defense, the effectiveness of the offensive line, or even the impact of modern passing strategies that rely heavily on short, quick throws.
Moreover, advancements in technology—think about the extensive use of analytics, video breakdowns, and real-time data—have transformed how we analyze player performance. The NFL has already embraced these technologies in other areas, so why not apply them to passer ratings?
Imagine a passer rating system that gives credit for yards after catch (YAC) or accounts for a quarterback’s ability to create plays under pressure. This would provide a more comprehensive picture of a player's impact on the game.
A Call to Action
As we continue to watch thrilling matchups and incredible performances on the field, it’s crucial for the NFL to evolve alongside its athletes. The league has a responsibility to ensure that its statistics reflect the current state of the game, celebrating those who shine brightly in this new era.
So, let’s get the conversation going. Fans, analysts, and decision-makers need to rally around the idea that the passer rating system is due for an upgrade. It’s about time we recognized the full spectrum of quarterback talent and performance in today’s NFL.
With so many extraordinary performances going underappreciated due to outdated metrics, we have a unique opportunity to push for change. Just think about it: every time a quarterback breaks records or leads a game with an outstanding performance, their efforts should be acknowledged in a way that aligns with the realities of modern football.
In conclusion, as we head into another thrilling Sunday of NFL action, let’s keep in mind that while we celebrate those who hit the mythical 158.3 passer rating, we should also take a moment to consider all the performances that deserve recognition. The game has changed, and so should the way we evaluate it. After all, in the world of football, accuracy and fairness matter just as much as the plays on the field. Let’s champion a more inclusive and accurate way to measure quarterback success!
Login