Canada Joins Britain and France in Recognizing Palestine: A Bold Move Amid Middle East Turmoil

Written by Published

Canada Joins the Push to Recognize Palestine: A New Chapter in the Israel-Palestine Conflict?

In a major diplomatic move this week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that Canada will officially recognize the State of Palestine in September. This follows similar decisions made recently by Britain and France, signaling a significant shift in international stances on the decades-old Israel-Palestine conflict.

A Changing Global Landscape

More than 100 countries gathered at the United Nations earlier this week, debating the future of a two-state solution — the vision of separate, sovereign Israeli and Palestinian states living side-by-side in peace. The idea isn’t new. In fact, the U.N. General Assembly backed a resolution in December 2024 supporting this very solution. But political realities on the ground make the situation anything but straightforward.

Carney emphasized that “preserving a two-state solution means standing with all people who choose peace over violence or terrorism.” He called the peaceful coexistence of Israel and Palestine the only viable roadmap for a secure and prosperous future for the region.

Yet, Israel continues to reject the two-state framework. Strongly backed by the United States, Israel remains opposed to unilateral recognition of Palestine without a negotiated peace deal. This opposition is echoed by Israel’s close allies, making Canada’s upcoming move all the more controversial.

Why Now? The Gaza Humanitarian Crisis

The urgency around the issue has been fueled by the devastating humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza. Since Hamas’s surprise invasion of Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has imposed a blockade on Gaza, leading to widespread famine and suffering. According to the Hamas-run Health Ministry, the death toll in Gaza has surpassed 60,000 — most of them civilians.

This tragic toll has intensified global calls for a cease-fire and a sustainable resolution. “The Palestinian people have been living hell for two years,” said Mona Abuamara, former chief representative of the Palestinian General Delegation to Canada. She stresses that Palestinians urgently need the chance to build their own state.

Canada’s Stance: Conditional, But Clear

Prime Minister Carney made it clear that Canada’s recognition hinges on democratic reforms within the Palestinian leadership. The Palestinian Authority is expected to hold elections in 2026 and commit to reforms that would promote stability and peace.

Importantly, Carney wants to exclude Hamas from any political process or elections, citing their role in perpetuating violence. He condemned Hamas’s actions during the war and demanded the release of Israeli hostages still in captivity.

Canada’s decision marks a departure from its earlier position, which supported recognition only after a negotiated peace settlement. This new approach aligns Canada more closely with European neighbors Britain and France, both of whom have made similar moves.

Britain and France: Leading the Charge

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer set a deadline: If Israel doesn’t agree to a cease-fire by September, Britain will recognize Palestine. French President Emmanuel Macron has also expressed support, though without attaching strict conditions.

Carney has been in talks with both leaders, acknowledging the rapidly shrinking window for a Palestinian state to emerge peacefully. “In our judgment, and the judgment of others, the prospect of a Palestinian state is literally receding before our eyes,” Carney said.

Canada plans to formally announce recognition of Palestine during the upcoming U.N. General Assembly, joining several other nations like Spain, Norway, and Ireland who have already recognized the state amid the ongoing conflict.

Israel’s Firm Opposition

Unsurprisingly, Israel has pushed back hard against this diplomatic shift. The Israeli Foreign Ministry criticized Canada’s move as rewarding Hamas and undermining efforts for a ceasefire and hostage release.

Israel’s ambassador to Canada, Iddo Moed, went even further on social media, calling the recognition campaign a “distorted” attack against Israel and vowing that the Jewish state “will not sacrifice our very existence” to allow what he called a “jihadist state” to be imposed on its ancestral homeland.

Israel, home to 9.8 million people — about 7.2 million of whom are Jewish — controls territories with large Palestinian populations, including 2.2 million in Gaza and 3 million in the West Bank. Despite this, Palestinians’ movement remains heavily restricted, and Israel has established numerous settlements in the West Bank, which most of the international community considers illegal.

The Palestinian Political Landscape

The Palestinians themselves are politically divided. The Palestinian Authority governs parts of the West Bank, while the militant Hamas group controls Gaza. Neither entity has held elections since 2006, complicating prospects for unified governance and peace negotiations.

Carney’s insistence on democratic reforms and exclusion of Hamas highlights the challenge of negotiating peace with fragmented leadership on the Palestinian side.

U.S. Policy: A Mixed Record

The United States, Israel’s closest ally, has historically backed the two-state solution under administrations from Presidents George W. Bush to Barack Obama and Joe Biden. However, former President Donald Trump broke with tradition by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and stepping away from the two-state framework.

Trump’s policies drew sharp criticism from Palestinians and much of the international community, deepening mistrust on both sides.

Following Macron’s announcement, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly rejected France’s plan on social media, calling it “reckless” and a setback for peace that served Hamas propaganda. Rubio’s reaction underscores the deep divisions even among Western allies about how to handle the conflict.

Historical Context: The Long Road

The roots of the conflict trace back to 1947, when Britain’s mandate over Palestine ended and the U.N. proposed partitioning the land into Jewish and Arab states. Israel accepted the plan, but neighboring Arab nations rejected it and launched war. Jordan took control of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, Egypt oversaw Gaza, and Israel captured these territories in the 1967 Six-Day War.

Since then, Israel has exercised military control over these areas, and the Palestinians have struggled to establish sovereignty.

The Canadian Conservative Party Pushback

Not everyone in Canada agrees with Carney’s approach. The Conservative Party slammed the decision, warning that a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood without peace talks or a rejection of violence “destroys the path to a lasting two-state solution.” They went further, accusing Hamas of ruling Gaza through “fear, oppression and brutality,” and argued that recognition rewards terrorism.

What’s Next?

With the world watching closely, Canada’s upcoming move to recognize Palestine will likely ripple across diplomatic circles and further complicate the path to peace. The decision illustrates how the international community is wrestling with balancing Israel’s security concerns against Palestinian aspirations for statehood amid one of the deadliest conflicts in recent memory.

As Carney put it, “Any path to lasting peace for Israel also requires a viable and stable Palestinian state—one that recognizes Israel’s inalienable right to security.”


Key Takeaways:

  • Canada to recognize Palestinian state in September, following Britain and France.

  • Recognition tied to Palestinian democratic reforms and elections in 2026.

  • Israel strongly opposes the move; U.S. remains divided on the issue.

  • Gaza faces severe humanitarian crisis with over 60,000 civilian deaths.

  • Palestinians politically divided between Hamas in Gaza and Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.

  • The conflict’s historical complexity dates back to 1947 U.N. partition plan.

  • Canadian Conservatives criticize recognition as undermining peace efforts.