Ceasefire at Risk: Deadly Strikes and Mortar Attacks Escalate Tensions in Lebanon

Written by Published

The recent deadly air strikes by Israel and a mortar attack by Hezbollah have sparked concerns that the fragile ceasefire in Lebanon could collapse, pushing the region to the brink of further conflict. This escalation comes on the heels of a fragile peace agreement brokered last week, which had brought hopes of ending over a year of intense fighting. However, the events of the past few days have shaken those hopes.

On Monday night, Israel carried out its largest wave of air strikes in southern Lebanon since the ceasefire agreement was made, killing ten people, as reported by Lebanon's health ministry. The attacks primarily targeted Hezbollah positions, which Israel claims are responsible for hostile activities. In retaliation, Hezbollah fired two mortars at an Israeli military base situated in a disputed border area. Although no casualties were reported, Hezbollah’s actions were seen as a direct warning over what it perceived as Israel’s continuous violations of the ceasefire terms. The situation is undoubtedly tense, with both sides accusing each other of undermining the peace agreement.

The Israeli military maintained that its air strikes were aimed at Hezbollah fighters, launchers, and infrastructure in southern Lebanon. The strikes were reportedly carried out in at least 11 locations, with some of the hardest-hit areas being Haris, where six people were killed, and Tallousseh, which saw four deaths. The Israeli defense forces also targeted a Hezbollah mortar launcher that had fired the shells towards the disputed Mount Dov/Shebaa Farms area, which Israel occupies.

Israel, unwavering in its stance, has demanded that Lebanese authorities do more to prevent Hezbollah from carrying out operations from Lebanese territory, citing the mortar attack as a violation of the ceasefire. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized that Israel would not hesitate to act in response to violations, warning that even minor breaches would provoke retaliation. Israel’s commitment to enforcing the ceasefire is clear, though the situation remains precarious as Hezbollah continues to resist what it perceives as ongoing Israeli aggression.

In a statement, Hezbollah confirmed it had carried out the mortar attack, asserting that it was a defensive measure and a “warning” against Israel's repeated violations of the ceasefire agreement. Hezbollah accused Israel of targeting civilians, carrying out air strikes, and even breaching Lebanese airspace, further straining an already fragile peace. The group made it clear that these actions could not be ignored, describing them as a direct provocation that warranted a military response.

Despite the violence, the U.S. government, which, alongside France, helped broker the ceasefire, has stated that the ceasefire agreement is “largely holding,” although it has acknowledged that violence persists. The U.S. is closely monitoring the situation to ensure compliance, with hopes that the ceasefire will stabilize the region after the devastating conflict that began in October 2023. During this period, over 3,960 people have died, many of them civilians, and nearly one million people have been displaced from areas where Hezbollah operates. The scale of the human suffering has been immense, and the toll on civilians continues to mount.

Hezbollah’s involvement in the initial outbreak of conflict came after the group fired rockets into northern Israel, which was interpreted as a show of support for Palestinians in Gaza following Hamas's brutal attack on southern Israel. This set off a chain reaction, with Israel launching extensive airstrikes and a ground invasion in an attempt to dismantle Hezbollah's military infrastructure. The conflict displaced tens of thousands of Israeli civilians and Lebanese residents, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis.

Under the ceasefire agreement, Hezbollah has been given a 60-day window to remove its armed presence from the area between the Blue Line, the unofficial border between Israel and Lebanon, and the Litani River, approximately 30 kilometers to the north. The deal also stipulates that Israeli forces will withdraw from this area within the same timeframe, and Lebanese army units, along with UN peacekeepers, will be deployed to secure the region. This framework aims to establish a buffer zone and prevent further hostilities, but the recent escalations have put this plan in jeopardy.

The situation is further complicated by the involvement of various international players. U.S. officials, alongside the French, have been working diligently to ensure that the ceasefire is respected. However, as violence continues to erupt, both sides are increasingly accusing each other of violations. Lebanese officials, including parliamentary speaker Nabih Berri, who is an ally of Hezbollah and was instrumental in negotiating the ceasefire, have pointed to Israeli actions as clear violations of the terms agreed upon. Berri has publicly criticized Israel’s continued military operations, calling them a “flagrant violation” of the ceasefire.

The U.S. has been vocal in its support for the ceasefire’s continued implementation, with White House National Security spokesperson John Kirby stating that, despite ongoing violations, the situation has improved from the earlier days of the conflict. He highlighted the decrease in the number of Israeli strikes, noting that they have reduced from dozens per day to just one or two. Still, he stressed that much more work remains to be done to achieve lasting peace in the region.

In response to the ongoing tensions, Israeli officials have taken a firm stance, reiterating that they will not tolerate Hezbollah’s presence south of the Litani River. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar emphasized that any movement of Hezbollah forces into this area would be considered a breach of the ceasefire terms. In an effort to assert Israel’s commitment to the peace process, Saar declared that Israel would take immediate action if armed Hezbollah fighters were found south of the Litani River or if there were attempts to move weapons.

The international community is deeply invested in ensuring that the ceasefire holds, but as tensions rise, it becomes increasingly clear that peace in Lebanon remains fragile. The United Nations, which has deployed peacekeepers in the region, along with the U.S. and France, are playing pivotal roles in maintaining a delicate balance. However, the volatile situation on the ground continues to threaten this fragile peace, as each side accuses the other of undermining the ceasefire agreement.

With the ceasefire agreement under growing strain, the world watches closely to see whether a lasting peace can be achieved or if the conflict will escalate once again. While there have been positive signs, the risks of a renewed war are ever-present, and the consequences for both Lebanon and Israel could be devastating. For now, the international community's efforts to mediate the conflict remain critical in preventing further bloodshed.