Israel kicked off a major military offensive in Gaza City on Thursday, pushing thousands of residents to flee as violence escalates across the densely populated city of about 1 million people. The operation, led by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), comes after troops managed to secure the city’s outskirts under a relentless barrage of airstrikes and artillery fire. The offensive represents a significant escalation in Israel’s effort to gain control over the 25% of Gaza it doesn’t currently hold.
Residents of neighborhoods like Zeitoun and Sabra were among the first to evacuate, moving northwest within the city in hopes of reaching safer areas. Local officials described the scene as chaotic, with families carrying their belongings, trying to escape what is fast becoming an intense urban battlefield.
The overnight surge in military action follows Israel’s announcement on Wednesday that it would “intensify strikes on Hamas in Gaza City, the political and military stronghold of the terror organization.” While the Israeli government insists it is taking steps to minimize civilian casualties, including issuing evacuation orders, the reality on the ground is anything but safe.
The World Health Organization (WHO) warned that these evacuation orders could exacerbate the already dire situation in Gaza’s hospitals. With medical facilities operating at nearly triple their normal capacity, doctors and staff are struggling to treat a continuous influx of casualties, many with complex trauma wounds. For hospitals already under “unbearable pressure,” forcing thousands into smaller, crowded areas could push the healthcare system to the brink of collapse.
Meanwhile, the international community has raised alarms. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for an immediate cease-fire and the unconditional release of hostages, emphasizing the urgent need to avoid further “death and destruction” that a full-scale offensive on Gaza City could bring. His appeal underscores growing global concern that continued military escalation could spiral into a humanitarian catastrophe.
This offensive comes despite a recent cease-fire and a hostage-prisoner swap deal brokered by Egypt and Qatar, which Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups have reportedly accepted. On the domestic front, Israel faces increasing opposition to the war, and tensions with Western allies are mounting. Australia, in particular, is moving closer to recognizing Palestinian statehood—a development that has further strained diplomatic relations with Jerusalem.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not hold back in his response to Australia. After far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman was barred from entering the country for a scheduled speaking tour in Sydney and Melbourne, Netanyahu publicly criticized Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Speaking on Australian TV on Thursday, Netanyahu called Albanese’s reputation “forever tarnished by the weakness he showed in the face of these Hamas terrorist monsters.”
The Jerusalem government also retaliated diplomatically, announcing the cancellation of visas for Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority. Earlier in the week, Netanyahu had shared a pointed online post asserting that history would judge Albanese harshly, branding him as a “weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.” The public sparring highlights how international politics and military conflicts are increasingly intertwined, with regional military actions reverberating on the global stage.
Back in Gaza, the human cost of the offensive is mounting rapidly. Thousands of residents, already traumatized by weeks of bombardment, are scrambling to escape active combat zones. Families report difficulty finding safe shelter, as the IDF targets key strategic areas held by Hamas while trying to maintain a veneer of minimizing civilian harm. Yet, even with evacuation orders, the sheer density of Gaza City makes it nearly impossible to avoid civilian casualties entirely.
Military analysts point out that Israel’s strategy appears focused on urban warfare, where controlling city infrastructure can severely limit the operational capabilities of Hamas. Yet urban combat comes at an immense cost. Historically, similar offensives have caused high civilian casualties and long-term infrastructural damage. In addition to human suffering, hospitals, schools, and public utilities are being stretched to their limits, raising concerns about sanitation, water supply, and basic services in the coming weeks.
For residents, the psychological toll is enormous. The constant threat of airstrikes, the sight of destroyed homes, and the looming presence of soldiers create an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty. Aid organizations warn that mental health impacts will persist long after the military conflict ends. Meanwhile, journalists on the ground report harrowing scenes: families huddling in basements, children too scared to leave their shelters, and streets lined with rubble from collapsed buildings.
The timing of the offensive is particularly sensitive. Just days earlier, diplomatic efforts had aimed to ease tensions through negotiated agreements. Yet Israel’s decision to intensify strikes suggests that, despite international mediation, the military sees capturing Gaza City as a strategic priority that outweighs potential diplomatic fallout. The move also signals a willingness to engage in prolonged urban combat, even under intense global scrutiny.
Observers note that the offensive may also have political undertones for Netanyahu. Domestically, projecting a strong military posture can reinforce his image as a decisive leader, particularly amid domestic opposition to the war and ongoing political controversies. Internationally, however, this aggressive approach risks alienating allies, as seen in the increasingly tense exchanges with Australia.
The humanitarian situation is further complicated by the fact that hospitals are not just overwhelmed—they are becoming targets themselves, with some health facilities reporting damage from nearby strikes. Medical personnel are working around the clock, often with limited resources, while facing the impossible task of triaging critical injuries under constant threat of bombardment. Supplies like blood, surgical instruments, and basic medications are running dangerously low.
For the people of Gaza City, the offensive is more than just a military operation—it is an existential crisis. Thousands of families are forced to weigh the risk of staying in their homes against the peril of trying to flee to already crowded areas. Humanitarian agencies are scrambling to provide relief, but the speed and scale of the military action have made it nearly impossible to keep pace.
While Israel continues its offensive, international calls for restraint are intensifying. Guterres’ appeals for a cease-fire and humanitarian access underscore a growing recognition that civilian lives are at imminent risk. Aid agencies, alongside global media outlets, are raising awareness of the human toll, hoping to pressure decision-makers into prioritizing humanitarian considerations over strategic gains.
In summary, Gaza City has become a flashpoint of violence, international diplomacy, and humanitarian concern. Israel’s push to take full control of the city has triggered mass displacement, intensified hospital crises, and sparked heated diplomatic clashes, particularly with Australia. At the same time, global leaders, including the U.N., are warning that the situation could quickly spiral into a full-blown humanitarian disaster if immediate measures, including a cease-fire, are not implemented.
With both sides entrenched in their positions, the coming days will be critical—not only for the military and political landscape but for the tens of thousands of civilians whose lives hang in the balance. The world is watching, as Gaza City becomes the center of a conflict that is shaping global alliances, testing humanitarian frameworks, and redefining the stakes of modern urban warfare.
Login