As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu makes his case before a joint session of Congress, it's time for Washington to confront a hard truth: its unwavering support for Israel’s war in Gaza isn’t helping U.S. interests or stabilizing the region. Instead, it’s creating more problems and contributing to a massive human cost.
So, what’s really going on? Let’s dive into the situation.
Israel’s Misguided Strategy
Netanyahu is sticking to the belief that Israel’s military can completely wipe out Hamas in Gaza. But recent admissions from Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Daniel Hagari suggest otherwise. Hagari noted, “Anyone who thinks we can eliminate Hamas is wrong.” Despite the intense military campaign, Hamas is still very much operational. U.S. intelligence reports that only about 30-35% of Hamas’s military wing has been taken out since October 7, and the group has actually managed to recruit thousands of new members during this conflict. Hamas isn’t just a militant group; it’s deeply ingrained in Gaza’s political landscape.
The Ongoing Conflict and Its Consequences
Israel can certainly degrade Hamas’s capabilities and target its leaders, but without a viable political solution, Palestinian militancy is likely to persist. Sadly, there’s no indication of a breakthrough. Netanyahu’s strategy appears to involve an indefinite military occupation of Gaza. Recently, Israel’s parliament passed a motion with overwhelming support, rejecting the idea of Palestinian statehood, even if it’s part of a negotiated settlement. This stance is a recipe for perpetual violence.
Meanwhile, the devastation in Gaza, funded in part by Washington, is harming America’s global reputation. The current conflict has exceeded the bounds of prevention and self-defense, drawing uncomfortable comparisons to the U.S. response after the 9/11 attacks. Israel’s aggressive actions are creating future turmoil by killing thousands of innocent civilians, destroying Gaza’s infrastructure, and causing severe shortages of essential resources like food. These impacts will haunt Gaza for generations, and Washington’s role—particularly in providing the weaponry fueling much of the destruction—undermines its claim of leading a “liberal” or “rules-based” international order.
Potential for Regional Escalation
The situation has the potential to escalate further. The war has already triggered a ripple effect of regional tensions, with increased hostilities spreading to Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and between Israel and Iran. The risk of a broader conflict, especially between Israel and Hezbollah, is high. U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, C.Q. Brown, has warned that Iran might significantly support Hezbollah, which possesses a large arsenal of missiles capable of reaching deep into Israel. This could drag U.S. forces in the region into a larger conflict, which would be detrimental to U.S. interests and Middle East stability. As long as Israel’s campaign in Gaza continues, the likelihood of regional war and direct U.S. involvement remains elevated.
U.S. Support for Israel: A Double-Edged Sword
The U.S. has thrown its full support behind Israel, casting multiple vetoes at the U.N. Security Council and approving over $41 billion in arms transfers. On top of that, there’s been around $15 billion in additional military aid and a significant buildup of U.S. military forces in the Middle East. The Biden Administration’s approach has essentially placed the U.S. at the heart of Israel’s Gaza conflict.
American foreign policy in the Middle East has long been problematic, with the imbalanced relationship between the U.S. and Israel being a major factor. Washington’s reflexive support for Israel has clouded its judgment on the region, which is of limited strategic importance now that the U.S. is energy-independent. Given the U.S.’s current struggles both domestically and internationally, continuing to back Israel in this conflict only deepens America’s entanglement in a troubled situation.
What About the Future?
With President Biden out of the presidential race, Kamala Harris, the current Democratic frontrunner, has a chance to shift the U.S. approach to Israel and Gaza. Harris has called for Israel to address the “immense scale of suffering” in Gaza but has otherwise remained a staunch supporter of Israel, much like Biden. Mere rhetoric without a substantive policy change won’t suffice. A potential Trump victory might not offer much respite either, given his strong backing of Israel and his statements suggesting that he would let Israel “finish the job” in Gaza.
The Path Forward
So, where does this leave us? It should be crystal clear that by continuing to back Israel’s war in Gaza, the U.S. is setting itself—and the Middle East—up for disaster. Washington needs to rethink its bipartisan, blank-check support for Israel and reconsider its role in this ongoing tragedy. It’s time for a new direction that prioritizes genuine peace and stability over blind allegiance.
In summary, the current U.S. stance on the Gaza conflict is not only failing to advance American interests but is actively exacerbating regional instability and contributing to a humanitarian crisis. A reevaluation of U.S. policy is crucial to avoid further entanglement and to work towards a more balanced and effective approach to Middle Eastern diplomacy.
Login