US Brokered Ceasefire Deal Aims to End Hezbollah-Israel Conflict, But Questions Remain
In a dramatic move toward peace, US President Joe Biden has announced a ceasefire deal that aims to end the 13-month-long conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, the powerful Lebanese militia supported by Iran. The deal, hailed as a step toward de-escalation, promises to halt the fighting that has left the region on edge and stoked fears of a wider regional conflict.
In a joint statement with France, the US declared that the agreement would not only cease hostilities in Lebanon but also secure Israel from the persistent threat posed by Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations operating in the region. While both sides of the conflict have expressed cautious optimism, many significant questions about the long-term viability of the ceasefire remain unanswered.
A Glimpse of Hope for Lasting Peace?
President Biden, in his announcement, described the agreement as “designed to be a permanent ceasefire.” This statement carries significant weight, considering the past failures of peace initiatives in the region. If successful, this ceasefire could represent a turning point in the ongoing strife between Hezbollah and Israel.
Under the terms of the ceasefire, Hezbollah is given 60 days to remove its fighters and weaponry from the area between the Blue Line—the unofficial border between Lebanon and Israel—and the Litani River, approximately 20 miles to the north. This move is intended to curb the growing military presence of Hezbollah in the region and reduce the potential for future attacks on Israel. During this period, the Lebanese army is set to step in and replace Hezbollah forces, ensuring that the area remains free of military infrastructure.
However, the key challenge lies in the ability of the Lebanese army to enforce these terms effectively. While Hezbollah will withdraw, the 5,000 Lebanese troops expected to take their place may face significant challenges in maintaining order, given the country’s complex sectarian landscape and the entrenched divisions within the Lebanese military. Questions have already arisen over whether the Lebanese army will be able or willing to confront Hezbollah if the militia refuses to comply with the agreement.
Will the Lebanese Army Be Able to Deliver?
The Lebanese army’s role in this ceasefire deal is a critical one, but its ability to perform its duties is under scrutiny. Many critics argue that Lebanon’s military lacks the necessary resources—such as adequate funding, equipment, and manpower—to successfully enforce the ceasefire and ensure Hezbollah does not regain its foothold in southern Lebanon.
While Lebanon's allies, including France and the United States, have pledged to support the Lebanese Armed Forces, there are concerns about the army’s readiness. This support could come in the form of military assistance, training, and equipment, which would help bolster the Lebanese army’s ability to manage the transition.
Despite these challenges, Western officials argue that Hezbollah has been significantly weakened in recent months, making this an opportune moment for Lebanon to reassert control over its own territory. The international community has expressed hope that the Lebanese government will rise to the occasion and successfully implement the terms of the ceasefire, but there is no denying that the task ahead is daunting.
Monitoring and Enforcement: Who’s In Charge?
The implementation of the ceasefire will be monitored by an international coalition that includes the US, France, and the United Nations. This monitoring effort is crucial to ensuring that both sides adhere to the terms of the agreement and that any violations are swiftly addressed. The existing tripartite mechanism, which involves the UN peacekeeping force (Unifil), Lebanon, and Israel, will be expanded to include US and French participation. This partnership is expected to help facilitate the enforcement of the ceasefire and address potential violations before they escalate.
One of the most significant aspects of this deal is that it largely mirrors UN Security Council resolution 1701, which was passed after the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah. Under this resolution, the areas south of the Litani River were meant to be free of any armed personnel or weapons, except for those of the Lebanese state and the UN peacekeeping forces. However, both sides accused each other of violating this resolution, with Israel claiming Hezbollah had established a significant military presence in southern Lebanon and Lebanon accusing Israel of overflights and other violations of Lebanese sovereignty.
The new agreement aims to prevent a repeat of these violations by establishing a more robust and transparent monitoring system. Under the terms of the deal, Israel will also have the right to take military action if Hezbollah or any other militant group attempts to violate the ceasefire and pose a direct threat to Israel’s security.
Israel’s Right to Defend Itself
For Israel, the ceasefire agreement comes with a crucial provision: the right to self-defense. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made it clear that Israel would maintain full freedom to take military action in Lebanon if Hezbollah violates the ceasefire. Netanyahu stated unequivocally: “If Hezbollah violates the agreement and tries to arm itself, we will attack. If it tries to rebuild terrorist infrastructure near the border, we will attack. If it launches a rocket, if it digs a tunnel, if it brings in a truck carrying rockets, we will attack.”
While this provision may provide Israel with some comfort, it has raised concerns in Lebanon, where the right to strike back is not part of the ceasefire agreement. Lebanon has rejected any provision that would allow Israel to unilaterally act without Lebanese consent, but to address Israel’s concerns, there have been reports suggesting that the US will issue a letter confirming Israel’s right to self-defense.
President Biden has also weighed in on this matter, stating that Israel retains the right to defend itself against any direct threats, but he emphasized that the deal would also uphold Lebanon’s sovereignty. This delicate balance will be crucial in determining the success of the ceasefire.
The Road Ahead: Can Peace Hold?
While the ceasefire agreement has been heralded as a positive step, the road to lasting peace remains fraught with challenges. One of the most significant hurdles will be ensuring that Hezbollah does not regain its power and influence in southern Lebanon. Despite the ceasefire’s provisions, Hezbollah remains a deeply entrenched force with significant political and military support from Iran.
For Lebanon, this deal could represent a historic opportunity to reassert its sovereignty and re-establish control over its territory. However, the country must overcome substantial internal divisions and address the pressing issues of military readiness and political unity. The support of the international community will be critical in helping Lebanon navigate this difficult transition.
The broader Middle East is watching closely, as the outcome of this ceasefire will likely have implications beyond just Israel and Lebanon. If successful, it could serve as a model for addressing other regional conflicts and pave the way for a more stable and secure future. But as history has shown, the path to peace in the Middle East is never straightforward, and the challenge will be in ensuring that this ceasefire evolves into a lasting resolution.
In the meantime, the world waits with bated breath as this fragile peace agreement unfolds. Will it endure, or will the tensions of the past resurface to reignite the conflict? Only time will tell.
Login