US Urges Restraint as Tensions Escalate Between India and Pakistan Over Kashmir Attack

Written by Published

The United States is stepping up its efforts to prevent an all-out conflict between India and Pakistan, especially in the wake of a brutal massacre that took place in an Indian-administered area of Kashmir. Last week’s attack left 26 innocent civilians, most of them tourists, dead. As tensions soar between the two nuclear-armed nations, U.S. officials are calling for restraint, hoping to avoid further escalation in this already volatile region.

In a statement on Thursday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance made it clear that Washington is pushing Pakistan to actively pursue and dismantle any militant groups operating within its borders. While he acknowledged that some terrorist groups are believed to operate "sometimes" from Pakistan, he urged Islamabad to cooperate with India to ensure the perpetrators of the horrific attack are brought to justice.

“We don’t want this to spiral into something bigger. The last thing we need is another war between two nuclear powers,” Vance said in an interview on Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Baier.” “Our hope is that India responds to this attack in a way that avoids a broader regional conflict,” he continued. At the same time, he urged Pakistan to do its part in hunting down the terrorists who might be hiding within its territory.

This sentiment was echoed by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who earlier this week reached out to both Indian and Pakistani leaders. He called for both sides to engage in dialogue and cooperate to “de-escalate tensions.” In separate calls, Rubio expressed condolences to India for the lives lost in the attack and reassured New Delhi of America’s unwavering commitment to fighting terrorism. Similarly, in his conversation with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Rubio emphasized the need for Pakistan to join forces with India in the investigation, urging a united front in combating terrorism.

Pakistan, however, has been on high alert since the attack. Earlier this week, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar raised concerns, claiming that his country had credible intelligence that India was planning a military strike against Pakistan within 24 to 36 hours. While that threat has since passed, the heightened fears of escalation linger, as tensions between the two nations continue to rise.

Following the attack in Pahalgam on April 22, both countries have engaged in retaliatory actions. India shut down its airspace to Pakistani commercial flights, mirroring Pakistan’s decision to impose a flight ban on India in response to New Delhi’s decision to cancel visas for Pakistani nationals. Moreover, both nations have flexed their military muscles in recent days, with Pakistan shooting down an Indian drone it accused of being on an espionage mission in Kashmir. Meanwhile, India’s navy showcased its military capabilities by conducting test missile strikes to demonstrate readiness for long-range offensive operations.

Tensions have been particularly high along the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border that separates the two territories in Kashmir. Gunfire has been exchanged along the LoC for several nights, with both countries accusing each other of border violations. Pakistani officials also reported that Indian fighter jets came dangerously close to Pakistan’s airspace early Wednesday, though they did not cross the border and returned to base after a brief standoff. These claims have yet to be independently verified, and the Indian government has not issued a statement on the matter.

Kashmir, which has long been a flashpoint of conflict, remains one of the world’s most dangerous and contested regions. Both India and Pakistan lay claim to the entire territory, with the region divided between the two countries since the Partition of British India nearly 80 years ago. Over the years, the two nuclear-armed neighbors have fought three wars over the region, with airstrikes and skirmishes becoming more frequent in recent years.

The most recent spike in violence occurred in 2019 when India carried out airstrikes within Pakistan’s borders following an insurgent attack on Indian paramilitary forces in Kashmir. This marked the first time since the 1971 war that Indian forces launched an incursion into Pakistani territory. The latest attack on tourists in Kashmir has led some analysts to fear that India might respond similarly, given the political pressure on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to take a strong stance.

In fact, experts believe the current situation is more precarious than it was in 2019. According to Steven Honig and Natalie Caloca, researchers at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Modi’s political future is heavily tied to the success of his Kashmir policy. He has made the transformation and stabilization of Kashmir a key part of his legacy, and the terrorist attack on tourists puts his leadership under intense scrutiny. “Modi’s handling of Kashmir is more than just a political issue—it’s a matter of national pride,” they wrote. This increases the likelihood of India taking a more aggressive stance this time around.

On the other hand, military analysts note that any potential conflict between India and Pakistan would likely be asymmetrical, with India enjoying a clear advantage in terms of military size and capability. India’s defense budget far exceeds Pakistan’s, and its armed forces are significantly larger, with almost 1.5 million active-duty personnel compared to Pakistan’s 660,000. India also possesses a much more advanced arsenal, with a larger fleet of tanks, artillery, and aircraft. In contrast, Pakistan’s military relies more heavily on older Soviet-era aircraft, though it has made efforts in recent years to modernize its air force with Chinese-made J-10 jets.

Both countries also possess nuclear capabilities, though India has an edge in terms of missile range and nuclear-powered submarines. While Pakistan is believed to have around five dozen surface-to-surface missile launchers, India’s stockpile is slightly larger, and its nuclear submarines give it a significant advantage in any potential nuclear conflict.

Despite these differences, both countries remain on high alert, and the situation in Kashmir continues to deteriorate. The international community is watching closely, hoping that diplomatic efforts can prevent a wider regional war from breaking out. The stakes are incredibly high, and with both countries possessing nuclear weapons, the consequences of a military conflict would be catastrophic.

In the coming weeks, all eyes will remain on the actions of both India and Pakistan as they navigate this perilous situation. The U.S. continues to call for dialogue and cooperation, but with national pride and political pressures at play, it’s unclear whether both countries will heed the warnings. As tensions mount, the hope is that cooler heads will prevail and that both sides will prioritize peace over confrontation.

In the end, the goal is simple: Prevent further bloodshed, protect innocent lives, and keep this longstanding conflict from exploding into something far worse. The future of Kashmir—and the stability of the entire region—hangs in the balance.