A Republican committee aide was quick to clarify during a briefing at the Capitol on Monday, saying, "When you're citing the 13 million coverage loss, those are including policies that are not in our bill." In other words, the numbers Democrats are using are based on assumptions that don’t reflect the actual provisions in the bill that is currently being debated.
At the same time, Republicans have been reluctant to provide detailed figures about how much savings they expect to generate through work requirements for Medicaid recipients. Aides have urged patience, emphasizing that the full analysis from the CBO is needed before any definitive numbers can be provided. “It is a big driver in savings for us,” one aide explained, "but it’s hard to give exact figures right now because the policies interact with each other in complex ways."
A Battle for Public Opinion: The Role of CBO
One of the major talking points in this debate has been the role of the CBO in analyzing the bill. Republicans have criticized Democrats for attempting to force the CBO into publishing hypothetical analyses that weren’t necessarily intended for public consumption. They’ve warned that it’s irresponsible to take numbers from CBO analyses out of context, especially when the full picture isn’t yet available.
In their defense, Republicans have also pointed to the need for careful consideration of what is actually included in the bill, as opposed to unrelated provisions or policies that might distort the analysis. They’ve made it clear that they want to wait for the CBO’s final report before engaging in any further discussions.
The Road Ahead: GOP Control and Internal Tensions
Despite the uncertainty surrounding the CBO’s full analysis, Republicans are confident that their markup will succeed. With a 29-23 majority at the committee, they’re poised to push the bill forward, placing it on the path to inclusion in the full reconciliation bill. However, Speaker Mike Johnson has a tight margin to work with—he can afford only three defections from his party when the bill goes to a full House vote.
This slim margin has led to some internal tension among Republicans, with hardliners already signaling that they may not be fully on board. Texas Republican Rep. Chip Roy made his frustrations clear in a post on X, calling on leadership to come up with a backup plan. "I'm not here to rack up an additional $20 trillion in debt over 10 years," Roy wrote, voicing concerns that the bill might subsidize "healthy, able-bodied adults" and "corrupt blue states."
What’s at Stake? A Complex Political Dance
As this drama unfolds, the stakes could not be higher for both parties. The GOP’s ambitious plan to overhaul Medicaid is designed to save hundreds of billions, but it’s also sparking a fierce battle over the future of healthcare for millions of Americans. With Trump’s endorsement adding fuel to the fire, Republicans are rallying behind their proposals, even as they await the CBO’s full analysis. Democrats, on the other hand, are raising alarms over potential coverage losses, warning that the true consequences of the bill could be much worse than predicted.
In the coming days, as the markup and eventual vote approach, the political pressure will only intensify. Republicans may have the numbers on their side in the committee, but whether they can unite their party and win over skeptical members remains to be seen. For now, all eyes are on the CBO, whose analysis could provide crucial insights that might shape the future of Medicaid and the broader healthcare landscape.
The key question everyone is asking: will Republicans be able to sell their vision of Medicaid reform as a much-needed overhaul, or will the political fallout from coverage losses make this "big, beautiful bill" more of a political liability than a victory? Only time will tell, but with so many moving parts, one thing is certain—this battle is far from over.
Login