Trump’s Tariff War: A Bold Move or Presidential Overreach?
It’s been called bold, controversial, and even unconstitutional. Former President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs — a cornerstone of his aggressive trade policy — have sparked not just global tension but also a full-blown legal showdown on U.S. soil. And now, it’s heading to the courts in a big way.
Let’s break down what’s happening, why it matters, and how it could reshape the balance of power in Washington for years to come.
🚨 A National Emergency... Over Trade?
In a move that stunned economists and constitutional experts alike, President Trump in 2019 invoked a national emergency to justify tariffs on imports from nearly every corner of the globe. He used a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to make the case that America’s decades-old trade deficits posed a threat so serious, it qualified as an emergency.
His argument? Countries exporting more to the U.S. than they imported created an imbalance that weakened American industry and security. To fix that, Trump slapped a 10% blanket tariff on many nations — and even went as far as suggesting “reciprocal” tariffs as high as 50% for countries running trade surpluses with the U.S.
He dubbed it “Liberation Day.”
⚖️ The Legal Storm Hits New York
Now, Trump’s declaration and subsequent tariffs are being challenged by at least seven lawsuits, with one of the biggest hearings unfolding in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York.
One of those suits? It comes straight from the heart of small business America. Five independent companies, fed up with unpredictable cost spikes and bureaucratic chaos, are asking the court to block the tariffs outright. Their claim? The president overstepped big time.
And they’re not alone.
Twelve U.S. states — mostly with Democratic leadership — have also taken legal action, calling Trump's use of emergency powers to tax imports a dangerous abuse of executive authority.
👔 Meet the Man Taking on the White House
Enter Jeffrey Schwab, a no-nonsense litigation director from the Liberty Justice Center. Schwab and his team are leading the legal charge on behalf of the five small businesses.
His stance? Crystal clear:
“The statute doesn’t actually say anything about giving the president the power to tariff. It doesn’t even mention the word ‘tariff.’”
The businesses argue that the trade deficit — which the U.S. has run for 49 consecutive years — isn’t a crisis. It’s not new. It hasn’t wrecked the economy. So calling it an emergency is, in their words, “a figment of his own imagination.”
🍷 A Wine Importer’s Fight for Survival
One of the faces behind the lawsuit is Victor Schwartz, the owner of V.O.S. Selections in New York. For nearly four decades, Victor built his business by importing unique wines and spirits from independent producers around the world.
But Trump’s tariffs? They’re threatening to unravel it all.
“It’s a race against time,” Schwartz says. “Will we get through it? I’m not sure exactly.”
His challenge is that his clients want specific regional wines — ones that American producers simply can’t replicate. On top of that, New York state laws require him to post prices a month in advance, leaving him scrambling whenever tariffs change overnight.
🧩 The Constitutional Question
Here’s where it gets tricky.
The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the exclusive power to impose taxes, including tariffs. But over the years, Congress has delegated more and more authority to the executive branch — especially when it comes to trade.
That opened the door for Trump’s dramatic use of the IEEPA. His defenders say it’s nothing new: President Richard Nixon also imposed tariffs during an economic crisis in 1971 using a similar law — the 1917 Trading With the Enemy Act. That earlier law helped shape the IEEPA’s language.
But critics say Nixon’s situation was different — and that allowing any president to unilaterally impose broad tariffs sets a dangerous precedent.
🏛️ Headed to the Supreme Court?
Experts like Kathleen Claussen, a trade law professor at Georgetown Law, believe this is just the beginning.
“This probably is something that has to be decided by the Supreme Court,” Claussen explained. “Tuesday’s hearing is just the opening salvo.”
If the courts agree with the plaintiffs and strike down the tariffs under IEEPA, the Trump administration — or whatever administration backs the policy — will undoubtedly appeal.
And here’s the kicker: Should the Supreme Court weigh in, they might end up using conservative legal doctrines (yes, the same ones used to limit powers under Biden) to strike down Trump’s actions. That means a Republican-led policy could get undone using Republican-favored legal arguments.
Now that’s irony.
⚙️ A Rare Coalition: States + Libertarians?
Perhaps the wildest twist? This legal battle has created an unlikely alliance. Democratic state attorneys general and libertarian legal groups — who usually advocate for less regulation — are standing side by side to challenge presidential power.
It’s rare to see these groups united on anything, but in this case, they share a common concern: the unchecked growth of executive authority at the expense of legislative oversight.
🧑⚖️ Congress Pushes Back (Sort Of)
Not everyone in Congress is on board with handing over trade authority like candy. Some lawmakers are starting to push back.
Republican Senator Chuck Grassley and Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell co-sponsored a bill that would force presidents to justify new tariffs to Congress. Lawmakers would then have 60 days to approve or reject the tariffs — otherwise, they’d automatically expire.
Sounds like common sense, right?
Unfortunately, the bill faces long odds. Most Republican lawmakers continue to show deep loyalty to Trump, and any such bill would face a likely veto if Trump (or a like-minded successor) were back in the Oval Office.
“That train has left the station,” says trade lawyer Warren Maruyama, who worked in the George W. Bush administration.
📉 What It Means for American Businesses
One thing’s for sure: American businesses are caught in the crossfire.
Thanks to the tariffs, the average U.S. import tax has soared to its highest level since 1934, even after a temporary truce with China. From tech manufacturers to wine importers, many are scrambling to adjust to unpredictable costs and global supply shocks.
The instability is not just a headache — it’s a serious threat to business continuity.
🚨 So… What’s Next?
Here’s what to watch in the coming weeks:
-
Will the U.S. Court of International Trade block Trump’s tariffs?
-
Could this escalate to a Supreme Court showdown?
-
Might Congress finally claw back some trade authority?
In a time when executive power continues to expand — often without clear checks — this case could mark a major turning point. It’s not just about tariffs. It’s about who truly holds the reins of power in American democracy.
So stay tuned. This one’s far from over.
Quick Recap:
-
Trump used a national emergency to impose tariffs under IEEPA.
-
Seven lawsuits challenge his authority, including from small businesses and 12 U.S. states.
-
The Constitution gives tariff powers to Congress — not the president.
-
A Supreme Court ruling may be on the horizon.
-
Businesses like V.O.S. Selections are feeling the heat — fast.
Login