President Donald Trump is facing a significant challenge in his quest to avoid a standoff over the nation's borrowing limit, and it’s not just coming from the Democrats. Members of his own party—specifically a sizable chunk of Republican lawmakers—could potentially complicate his efforts to extend the borrowing limit. This situation could have major implications for Trump’s broader legislative goals, especially as he attempts to fulfill big promises and navigate a Republican-controlled Congress with relatively narrow majorities.
According to a detailed analysis of roll-call votes and data from the Congressional Research Service, roughly a dozen GOP senators and 49 House Republicans have never voted in favor of raising the debt ceiling. That’s more than 20% of each of the two chambers. While many GOP members have backed debt ceiling increases in the past, they often did so in symbolic votes that were unlikely to pass. However, the significant portion of Republicans who have never supported such measures raises concerns that pushing through a debt ceiling hike could be more difficult than Trump might expect.
Raising the debt limit is essential for the nation's financial stability, and it’s something Trump needs to secure, especially if he wants to advance his legislative agenda. However, this task might not be as straightforward as simply including it in a massive, all-encompassing legislative package—the “one big, beautiful bill” Trump envisions for his second-term goals. This strategy is unlikely to attract much in the way of Democratic support, and as history has shown, such a proposal would face resistance within his own party.
In fact, these internal divisions have led some GOP leaders to consider alternatives for advancing the debt ceiling increase. One idea that’s gaining traction is attaching the debt ceiling increase to disaster relief for California, which has been hit hard by devastating wildfires. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) mentioned on NBC’s Meet the Press that this approach was among the options being discussed. By tying the debt ceiling extension to a vital aid package, Republicans hope to secure the votes necessary for both priorities.
However, this strategy is not without its own set of complications. Republicans have traditionally used the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip in their broader efforts to rein in government spending. The debt ceiling essentially caps the amount the U.S. Treasury can borrow to fund government obligations. If the debt ceiling isn’t raised, the government faces the possibility of defaulting on its obligations, which would have catastrophic economic consequences.
Trump’s relationship with debt ceiling negotiations has been rocky in the past. During his first term, Congress voted to suspend the debt limit three times as part of larger spending bills, each of which sparked significant opposition from within the GOP. Trump, hoping to avoid another showdown, made a failed attempt just last month to push for a debt ceiling extension as part of a broader government funding package. He also suggested eliminating the debt ceiling altogether. However, his proposal met with resistance from fiscal conservatives, who view the debt ceiling as a vital tool for controlling government spending.
Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) made it clear that he is opposed to abolishing the debt ceiling, arguing that it’s the only leverage Republicans have to curb excessive spending. Johnson, who has never voted for a debt ceiling increase, said, “Don’t do away with it. It’s the only leverage we have.” He also suggested he might be open to negotiating a debt ceiling increase if it were tied to substantial spending cuts.
Another staunch opponent of raising the debt ceiling without accompanying spending cuts is Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas), who echoed Johnson’s sentiments. Roy firmly believes that before the U.S. borrows more money, there must be a concerted effort to address the national debt and reduce government spending. He and his colleagues in the conservative House Freedom Caucus recently introduced a proposal that could support a two-year debt limit increase, but only if it’s paired with “dollar-for-dollar savings over 10 years.”
Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), another member of the Freedom Caucus, made it clear that while he shares Trump’s desire to get the legislative agenda moving, he also doesn’t want to see the national debt balloon even further. He advocates for reducing government spending before raising the debt ceiling. Biggs, along with Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), is one of the few Republicans who have never supported any measure to raise the debt ceiling, even in symbolic votes that had no chance of becoming law.
Biggs also voted against a government funding measure backed by Trump in December, which would have extended the debt ceiling through January 30, 2027. His opposition was a clear sign that Trump still faces resistance from within his own party on this issue. It’s a reminder that, even with a Republican majority in Congress, finding common ground on the debt ceiling may not be as simple as Trump hopes.
As lawmakers continue to debate the best course of action on the debt ceiling, it’s becoming apparent that internal divisions within the GOP could hinder progress. While some Republicans are open to negotiating a debt ceiling increase as long as it comes with spending cuts, others are adamantly opposed to raising the limit without significant fiscal reforms.
Rep. Biggs, for one, is skeptical of the idea of attaching a debt ceiling increase to disaster relief for California. He suggested that if GOP leadership chooses this route, it could be because they expect to secure Democratic votes, which could make the bill more palatable in the Senate. Biggs believes that if Republicans want to have a meaningful impact on reducing government spending, they should consider including the debt ceiling increase in a reconciliation package. This would allow the measure to pass with only Republican votes in the Senate, bypassing the need for Democratic support altogether.
Interestingly, some Republicans who have historically opposed debt ceiling increases are open to a more flexible approach. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), for example, has refrained from voting for past debt ceiling increases because they were paired with spending measures he couldn’t support. However, in a recent interview, Hawley acknowledged that abolishing the debt ceiling could be a viable idea under certain circumstances. He noted that the debt ceiling is often used as a political tool, and it doesn’t always achieve the desired results. In his view, the issue needs to be approached more thoughtfully, and if Trump can secure the right conditions, he might be able to garner more support for his proposal.
In conclusion, President Trump is facing a complex political landscape as he seeks to raise the debt ceiling and push through his legislative agenda. While some Republicans remain firmly opposed to any increase in the debt ceiling, others are open to negotiations if the right fiscal reforms are included. As the GOP continues to wrestle with these divisions, the path forward for Trump’s legislative priorities remains uncertain. Whether he can unite his party behind a comprehensive package that includes a debt ceiling increase will depend on how well he can navigate these internal divisions and secure the necessary votes from both wings of the Republican Party.
Login