On Saturday morning, Israel unleashed a series of airstrikes targeting key military sites in Syria’s capital, Damascus, and surrounding areas, a move that has sparked widespread attention and concerns. These strikes, which included a focus on rocket depots deeply buried beneath mountains, were part of Israel’s ongoing strategy to dismantle the military capabilities of Syria, particularly since the dramatic fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime just a few days earlier. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), a prominent war monitor, confirmed that these airstrikes were in line with Israel’s larger mission to neutralize Syria’s remaining military strength.
This attack follows a major Israeli military operation launched earlier in the week, which aimed at crippling Syria's strategic assets. These assets ranged from chemical weapons and missile systems to air defenses, the air force, and the navy. Israel’s objective was clear: prevent these advanced military capabilities from falling into the hands of hostile forces that could threaten Israeli security.
While there was no immediate response from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) regarding the latest strikes, previous statements indicated that Israel had already succeeded in destroying around 80% of Syria’s military infrastructure, and vowed to continue its operations until the remaining threats were neutralized. The early Saturday strikes seemed to be part of this ongoing effort to ensure that no significant military threat remains in the region.
The SOHR reported that Israeli airstrikes targeted a variety of key locations. Among the most significant were a scientific institute and various military facilities located in Barzeh, a district in northern Damascus. In addition, a military airport in the capital’s countryside was hit, along with numerous missile warehouses and launchers in the Qalamun region. The airstrikes also focused on rocket depots and tunnels hidden under mountains—critical elements of Syria’s military capabilities.
Israel’s actions come on the heels of a dramatic shift in the Syrian political landscape. A week earlier, rebels successfully toppled Bashar al-Assad’s government in a lightning-fast offensive. Assad’s fall marked the collapse of a regime that had long been a close ally of Iran, and a member of the so-called "Axis of Resistance" against Israel. Syria has also historically served as a key conduit for Iranian weapons shipments to Hezbollah, a militant group based in Lebanon that remains a significant concern for Israeli security. Given these geopolitical dynamics, Israel has been particularly wary of the prospect that the collapse of Assad’s regime could lead to the proliferation of military equipment to hostile groups.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized this fear in a statement made earlier in the week. Netanyahu conveyed Israel’s willingness to engage diplomatically with Syria’s new, rebel-led government, but made it clear that Israel would not hesitate to act militarily if its security was threatened. The message was clear: Israel was prepared to protect itself from any potential risks that might arise from the upheaval in Syria.
In a controversial move that has drawn international attention, Israel also entered a United Nations-patrolled buffer zone in the Golan Heights shortly after the fall of Assad’s regime. The Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War, has long been a point of contention between the two nations. The 1974 Disengagement Agreement established a demilitarized zone monitored by the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF), but Israel’s recent actions have raised concerns over potential violations of Syrian sovereignty.
The Israeli government, however, has stated that its actions in the buffer zone were purely defensive, aimed at preventing hostile forces from using the region as a launching pad for attacks on Israel. Israel insists that its presence in the zone is a temporary and limited measure designed to secure its borders during this period of upheaval in Syria. Despite these claims, the move has drawn criticism from Syria and some international observers, with concerns mounting over the potential for escalating tensions.
Meanwhile, the United Nations has expressed concern over Israel’s actions. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for greater respect for Syria’s sovereignty and expressed alarm over what he described as extensive violations. Guterres’ comments came after Syria’s representative to the UN called on the Security Council to take action against Israel. The Syrian government, which has now transitioned to an interim leadership after Assad’s fall, called for an immediate halt to Israeli airstrikes and demanded that Israeli forces withdraw from the Golan Heights buffer zone.
Syria’s new interim government, while still navigating the complexities of post-Assad governance, has firmly rejected Israel’s military incursions. In letters sent to both the UN Security Council and Guterres, Syria’s UN Ambassador Koussay Aldahhak criticized Israel’s actions as illegal and an affront to Syria’s sovereignty. Aldahhak’s letter, which invoked Syria’s aspirations for a future of freedom, equality, and stability, also demanded that the Security Council hold Israel accountable for its ongoing attacks on Syrian soil.
Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon responded by defending his country’s actions, arguing that Israel had taken only "limited and temporary measures" to protect its security in the face of growing instability in Syria. Danon’s letter emphasized that Israel’s primary goal was to safeguard its territory from threats posed by armed groups operating within the region, particularly those supported by Iran and Hezbollah. The back-and-forth between the two nations underscores the increasing complexity of the conflict in Syria and the shifting dynamics that are emerging in the aftermath of Assad’s downfall.
The rebel-led victory over Assad, although a monumental shift in the Syrian political landscape, has left the country in a state of uncertainty. As various factions vie for control, including groups with ties to extremist ideologies, Israel faces the difficult challenge of navigating these uncharted waters. The stakes are high, and Israel is focused on preventing the destabilization of its northern border. To this end, it has signaled that its airstrikes will continue for the foreseeable future, targeting any remaining threats.
This situation also raises questions about the future of Syria and the broader Middle East. With Assad’s regime no longer in power, the once tightly controlled country is now facing a power vacuum that has been filled by various rebel factions, some of which have ideological ties to al-Qaeda and other jihadist groups. As these groups jockey for power, Israel remains on high alert, prepared to take decisive action if necessary to defend its interests and ensure its security.
The ongoing conflict in Syria has sparked widespread concerns across the international community. While Israel’s actions are driven by its security concerns, they have been met with a mix of support and criticism from different international actors. The United Nations, for example, has expressed concern over the breach of Syrian sovereignty, while Syria itself has called for immediate action to curb Israeli military operations.
Israel’s military strategy in Syria continues to evolve, with no clear end in sight. As the situation develops, the focus remains on preventing the spread of weapons and military technologies to groups that could use them against Israel. Whether through diplomatic engagement or military action, Israel will likely continue to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of Syria and the broader region, particularly as the Assad era draws to a close and a new, uncertain chapter begins for the war-torn country.
The international community remains divided on how to approach the Syrian conflict, with some calling for a diplomatic resolution, while others back Israel’s military actions as a necessary measure to ensure regional stability. What is certain is that the situation remains fluid, and the stakes for Israel, Syria, and the Middle East as a whole could not be higher. As the dust settles, the world watches closely to see how this complex and ever-changing conflict unfolds.
Login