In a significant legal development in Hong Kong, a judge convicted seven individuals, including former pro-democracy lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting, for their involvement in a violent incident during the height of the city's anti-government protests in July 2019. The case centers around a brutal episode at a subway station, where a mob of about 100 men, armed with wooden poles and metal rods, attacked both protesters and bystanders. This violent altercation is remembered as one of the most harrowing chapters in the protests that shook Hong Kong.
The group of men, all dressed in white shirts—an unmistakable contrast to the black attire worn by the protesters—claimed to be defending their hometown of Yuen Long, a district in the New Territories. The attack, which left dozens injured, including Lam himself, intensified public discontent, especially when the police were criticized for their delayed response. This incident would go on to fuel the protest movement, increasing tensions between citizens and law enforcement.
In his ruling, Judge Stanley Chan found that Lam Cheuk-ting, who had previously claimed he was acting as a mediator, was in fact exploiting the situation for his own political advantage. Lam's comments, which were directed at the group of white-shirted men, were said to have “fanned the flames” of the violence. Instead of cooling the situation, the judge ruled that Lam’s actions exacerbated it, making the case a landmark moment in the ongoing struggle to shape Hong Kong's historical narrative surrounding the protests.
The seven individuals convicted are now facing sentencing, which is expected to take place in February. Following the announcement of the verdicts, emotions ran high in the courtroom. Several members of the public, sitting in the gallery, were visibly upset and some were moved to tears. In an act of defiance and support, others waved at the convicted individuals, with one person shouting “Hang in there, Ting!” in support of Lam. Despite the tense atmosphere, Lam appeared remarkably composed.
The prosecution presented evidence that the defendants had provoked the attackers, either by verbally confronting the white-shirted men, using obscene gestures, throwing objects, or spraying them with water from a hosepipe. Throughout the trial, the defendants maintained their innocence, pleading not guilty to the charges of rioting.
Lam Cheuk-ting defended his actions by stating that his presence in Yuen Long was motivated by a desire to use his influence as a lawmaker to pressure the police into taking action against the mob. He argued that he could not leave the scene because his fellow residents were in immediate danger. Some of the other defendants, who had used a hosepipe to spray the attackers, claimed they were simply trying to stop the violence and prevent further escalation. However, Judge Chan rejected these arguments, concluding that the actions of the defendants did not constitute self-defense, but rather contributed to the chaotic and violent atmosphere.
The 2019 protests, which began as a response to a controversial extradition bill that would have allowed criminal suspects in Hong Kong to be sent to mainland China for trial, quickly escalated into a broader social movement. While the government eventually withdrew the bill, the protests expanded their demands to include more democratic freedoms, such as the right to elect the city's leaders directly and increased accountability for the police force.
The protest movement became the largest and most significant challenge to the Hong Kong government since the city was handed over from British to Chinese rule in 1997. In an effort to quell the unrest, Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law in 2020. This law has been used to arrest and silence many pro-democracy activists, with others either fleeing into exile or facing lengthy prison sentences.
Lam Cheuk-ting, whose involvement in the 2019 protests has now led to multiple convictions, was sentenced to six years and nine months in prison in November as part of Hong Kong’s largest national security case. This marks a significant chapter in the crackdown on pro-democracy activists in the city, further illustrating the deepening political divide.
In total, more than 10,000 individuals were arrested in connection with the 2019 protests, with charges ranging from rioting to participating in unauthorized assemblies. The justice system in Hong Kong has faced increasing scrutiny for its role in prosecuting those involved in the protests, with many international observers raising concerns about the fairness and transparency of the legal proceedings.
The July 2019 mob violence in Yuen Long remains one of the most controversial and impactful events of the protests. In related cases, around 10 of the white-shirted men involved in the violence have also been convicted. These cases, along with the ongoing legal battles surrounding the protest movement, highlight the deepening political and social divisions in Hong Kong.
As the city grapples with the aftermath of these events, the case against Lam and the other defendants serves as a reminder of the complex and often dangerous dynamics at play during the 2019 protests. The impact of the violence in Yuen Long reverberates through Hong Kong's history, influencing both public sentiment and the legal landscape. With the sentencing of the seven convicted individuals still to come, the city is left to contemplate the broader implications of these events and what they mean for the future of Hong Kong’s political and social climate.
Login